Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
a) The game tree for k = 5 has been drawn in the uploaded picture below where C stands for continuing and S stands for stopping:
b) Say we were to use backward induction we can clearly observe that stopping is optimal decision for each player in every round. Starting from last round, if player 1 stops he gets $3 otherwise zero if continues. Hence strategy S is optimal there.
Given this, player 2’s payoff to C is $3, while stopping yields $4, so second player will also chooses to stop. To which, player 1’s payoff in k = 3 from C is $1 and her payoff from S is $2, so she stops.
Given that, player 2 would stop in k = 2, which means that player 1 would stop also in k = 1.
The sub game perfect equilibrium is therefore the profile of strategies where both players always stop: (S, S, S) for player 1, and (S, S) for player 2.
c) Irrespective of whether both players would be better off if they could play the game for several rounds, neither can credibly commit to not stopping when given a chance, and so they both end up with small payoffs.
i hope this helps, cheers
Answer:
who is nathan
Step-by-step explanation:
do u know her
Answer:
C) Both statements could be correct. RST could be the result of two translations of ABC. TSR could be the result of a reflection and a translation of ABC.
Step-by-step explanation:
When naming congruent shapes, the <u>orders of the congruent vertex letters need to be the same</u>.
Since these are isosceles triangles, the base angles are the same:
m∠R = m∠T = m∠A = m∠C
Therefore the congruency statement can be written two different ways.
ΔABC ≅ ΔRST
ΔABC ≅ ΔTSR
Both statements could be correct.
Choosing between B) and C):
To move ΔABC to where ΔRST or ΔTSR is, you could either:
i) Translate 6 units to the left, and translate 3 units down
ii) Reflect across the y-axis, and translate 3 units down
It can be the result of two translations or a reflection and a translation.
In the result, the base side RT is on the bottom of the shape, like side AC. If you rotated the shape, the base side would not be on the bottom. Therefore B) is incorrect.
Answer:
a rotation about point H
Step-by-step explanation:
i just took the test
1/10 of 2000 is 200 pounds. so 200 pounds of cheese
i guess you mean 100 times more lettuce than beef so that would be 200,000 pounds of lettuce
200+200,000=200,200 final answer
