Answer:
B
Step-by-step explanation:
Recommended for housing: 30%
X/100 = 612/1700
= 36%
Recommended for food: 10%
X/100 = 238/1700
= 14%
Recommended for transportation 15%
X/100 = 370/1700
= 21.8%
Answer:
7.5
Step-by-step explanation:
106% of $x = $7.95
In other words,
of $x = 7.95
Multiplying both sides of the equation by ![\[\frac{100}{106}\]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5C%5B%5Cfrac%7B100%7D%7B106%7D%5C%5D)
of x = 7.95 * ![[\frac{100}{106}]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B%5Cfrac%7B100%7D%7B106%7D%5D)
=> x = ![[\frac{750}{100}]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B%5Cfrac%7B750%7D%7B100%7D%5D)
=> x = ![[\frac{7.50}{1}]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B%5Cfrac%7B7.50%7D%7B1%7D%5D)
=> x = 7.5
Validation: 106% of 7.5 = 7.95
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
The computation of the area of kite ABCD is shown below:
Given data
AC = 10 ;
BD = 6
As we can see from the attached figure that the Kite is a quadrilateral as it involves two adjacent sides i.e to be equal
Now the area of quadrilateral when the diagonals are given
So, it is

where,

So, the area of the quadrilateral is

Answer:
- Andre subtracted 3x from both sides
- Diego subtracted 2x from both sides
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Andre</u>
Comparing the result of Andre's work with the original, we see that the "3x" term on the right is missing, and the x-term on the left is 3x less than it was. It is clear that Andre subtracted 3x from both sides of the equation.
__
<u>Diego</u>
Comparing the result of Diego's work with the original, we see that the "2x" term on the left is missing, and the x-term on the right is 2x less than it was. It is clear that Diego subtracted 2x from both sides of the equation.
_____
<em>Comment on their work</em>
IMO, Diego has the right idea, as his result leaves the x-term with a positive coefficient. He can add 8 and he's finished, having found that x=14.
Andre can subtract 6 to isolate the variable term, and that will give him -x=-14. This requires another step to get to x=14. Sometimes minus signs get lost, so this would not be my preferred sequence of steps.
As a rule, I like to add the opposite of the variable term with the least (most negative) coefficient. This results in the variable having a positive coefficient, making errors easier to avoid.