All categories

2 years ago

Find the missing term. () + (7 − 3i) + (5 + 9i) + 13i = 10 − 5i.

2 answers:

5 0

X + (7 - 3i) + (5 + 9i) + 13i = 10 - 5i

Subtract 13i from both sides

x + (7 -3i) + (5 + 9i) = 10 - 18i

Subtract (5 + 9i). MAKE SURE YOU SUBTRACT 9i TOO. In other words, distribute the negative and subtract 5 and 9i at the same time.

x + (7 - 3i) = 5 - 27i

Do the same with (7 - 3i). You'll be adding 3i since -(-3i) = 3i.

x = -2 - 24i

Archy [21]2 years ago

3 0

Answer:

the missing term is $(-2-24i)$

Step-by-step explanation:

Let

$(x+yi)$ ------> the missing term

we have

$(x+yi)+(7-3i)+(5+9i)+13i=10-5i$

Combine like terms in the left side

$(x+7+5)+(yi-3i+9i+13i)=10-5i$

$(x+12)+(yi+19i)=10-5i$

Solve the system of equations

$x+12=10$ ------> equation A

$x=10-12=-2$

$yi+19i=-5i$ ------> equation B

$yi=-5i-19i=-24i$

the missing term is $(-2-24i)$

You might be interested in

ris is a botanist who works for a garden that many tourists visit. The function f(s) = 2s + 25 represents the number of flowers

olasank [31]

Answer:

A. f(s) = 2s + 34

B. Mole

C. f(s) = 2s + 54

Step-by-step explanation:

A. Its a prediction the 34 can be any number reasonably close to 25

B. Amount of substance - mole (mole)

c. f(s) = 2s + 54

3 0

2 years ago

Icon" to view the SpeechStream® loolbar article for

RUDIKE [14]

<u>Answer:</u>

$\simeq 820 feet$

<u>Step-by-step explanation:</u>

He has asked me to move the finish line 0.25 km forward

Now,

we know that

1 km = 0.621371 mile

⇒ 0.25 km = $0.25 \times 0.621371$ mile

= $0.25 \times 0.621371 \times 1760 \times 3$ feet

(since 1760 yards = 1 mile and 3 feet = 1 yard)

= 820.20972 feet

$\simeq 820 feet$ . (Answer)

8 0

2 years ago

Q13. A stone is dropped from a height of 5 km. The distance it falls through varies directly with the

Simora [160]

I’m not sure but I think it might be C so sorry if it’s wrong

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In a large city, 6060% of people pass the drivers' road test. suppose that every day, 300300 people independently take the t

erma4kov [3.2K]

A) 180 would be expected to pass.
B) The standard deviation is 4.
C) 95% of people would fall between 172 and 188.
D) Yes, this is more than 3 standard deviations below the mean.

Explanation
A) Multiply the probability by the sample size:
0.6(300) = 180

B) Standard deviation is found by:
√n(p)(1-p)
For our data, we have:
√300(0.6)(0.4) = 4

C) Two standard deviations below the mean is 180-2(4) = 172; two standard deviations above the mean is 180+2(4)= 188.

D) Three standard deviations below the mean is 180-3(4) = 168; 134 is more than this below the mean. 99.7% of data fall within 3 standard deviations of the mean; 0.15% fall below this point, so yes, this is unusually low.

8 0

2 years ago

Senior management of a consulting services firm is concerned about a growing decline in the firm’s weekly number of billable hou

Reil [10]

Answer: (45.79, 51.21)

Step-by-step explanation:

Given : Significance level : $\alpha: 1-0.99=0.01$

Sample size : n= 51 , which is a large sample (n>30), so we use z-test.

Critical value: $z_{\alpha/2}=2.576$

Sample mean : $\overline{x}= 48.5\text{ hours}$

Standard deviation : $\sigma=7.5\text{ hours}$

The confidence interval for population means is given by :-

$\overline{x}\pm z_{\alpha/2}\dfrac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}$

i.e. $48.5\pm(2.576)\dfrac{7.5}{\sqrt{51}}$

i.e. $48.5\pm2.70534112234\\\\\approx48.5\pm2.71\\\\=(48.5-2.71, 48.5+2.71)=(45.79, 51.21)$

Hence, 99% confidence interval for the standard deviation of the number of hours this firm’s employees spend on work-related activities in a typical week = (45.79, 51.21)

7 0

2 years ago