Answer:
The correct response is Option B: A death-deferral phenomenon.
Explanation:
The study results regarding death deferral and Christmas suggest that people held off on dying until after Christmas because this is an important family holiday and it is suggested that people hold off on dying on such days. There has also been an examination of data regarding the death-deferral phenomenon regarding birthdays. There seems to be an association with fewer people dying in the six months leading up to their birthday than the six months after their birthday. These patterns, however, are hard to prove as being the result of a person's will to live in a systematic way.
Explanation:
Long before the need for sustainable development became widely recognised, the late Shaikh Zayed Bin Sultan Al Nahyan was achieving an environmental miracle: he was transforming the desert into a green haven.
Hamdi Tammam, in his book Zayed Bin Sultan Al Nahyan: The Leader and the March, wrote that the former president devoted much of his time making enquiries about the topography of the region.
After much research, Shaikh Zayed discovered that 15,000 years ago, the Arabian Peninsula was a very different place. Enveloped in thick forests and full of greenery, the land got transformed to a desert only after it was exposed to a long spell of drought that also forced its inhabitants to move in search of water. In time, the forests were buried and gradually transformed into the region's black gold or oil.
Shaikh Zayed charted a course to return the desert to its greener origins by increasing the number of trees, farms and palm orchards.
It grew from Western Europe to Eastern Europe, then collapsed to Eastern Europe
Here are the answers for the three questions;
1) According to socrates, must one heed popular opinion about moral matters?
Crito realizes that Socrates blamed not justly for his crimes. In spite of this, Socrates won't attempt to get away from his destiny.
Crito's first contention to Socrates is about what individuals will think. Crito says that Socrates' companions will be blamed for being excessively frightened or excessively shabby, making it impossible to organize his escape. He at that point contends that Socrates is giving his foes what they need by accepting his destiny. Crito urges him to battle the foul play that has happened. Socrates answers that Crito ought not to worry over how he is seen by others; he should center rather on living the correct way. He reminds Crito that popular opinion isn't generally the best opinion.
2) Does Socrates accept the fairness of the laws under which he was tried and convicted?
Socrates said to Crito that one is never just in fouling up, regardless of whether it is for the correct reasons. As it were, two wrongs don't make a right. Socrates has made consent to comply with the laws of Athens and has delighted in the benefits of these laws for a long time. On the off chance that he endeavored to escape it would not just break his agreement, which would not be right, yet additionally challenge the authority of the law.
3) Would Socrates have been wrong to escape?
He trusts it is inappropriate to get away or escape. This belief depends on what we call the social contract hypothesis of government today.
Hope it helps :)
Answer:
काश्मीर हिमालयाच्या खोऱ्यातील एक प्रदेश. अफगाणिस्तान, मध्य एशिया, तिबेट व भारतीय उपखंड यांच्या मध्यभागी. भारताच्या जम्मू आणि काश्मीर या राज्याचा प्रमुख भाग.
काश्मीर खोऱ्याचा जवळजवळ २/३ भाग भारताच्या ताब्यात 'जम्मू व काश्मीर' या राज्याचा भाग . तर १/३ भाग पाकिस्तानच्या ताब्यात आहे.पाकिस्तानच्या ताब्यातील भागाला पाकिस्तानात 'आजाद कश्मीर' तर भारतात 'पाकव्याप्त काश्मीर' म्हणतात. जम्मू-काश्मीर आणि ईशान्य भारतामध्ये पसरलेला दहशतवाद आणि १४ राज्यातल्या १६५ जिल्ह्यांमध्ये सुरू असलेल्या डाव्या विचारसरणीच्या मूलतत्ववाद्यांमुळे संपूर्ण देशाची सुरक्षितता धोक्यात आली आहे. त्यातच नक्षलवाद्यांना मिळणाऱ्या माफियांच्या मदतीमुळे देशाचे दोन तुकडे झाले आहेत, असे म्हटले तर वावगे ठरणार नाही.
देशातल्या ६०८ जिल्ह्यांपैकी २३१ जिल्ह्यांना आज घुसखोर, दहशतवादी, नक्षलवादी यांच्यामुळे खूप मोठा धोका निर्माण झाला आहे. जम्मू-काश्मीर आणि ईशान्य भारतामध्ये पसरलेला दहशतवाद आणि १४ राज्यातल्या १६५ जिल्ह्यांमध्ये सुरू असलेल्या डाव्या विचारसरणीच्या मूलतत्ववाद्यांमुळे संपूर्ण देशाची सुरक्षितता धोक्यात आली आहे. देशाच्या सुरक्षेवर आलेले संकट पाहता केंद्र आणि संबंधित राज्य सरकार या प्रश्नाच्या मूळापर्यंत पोहोचले आहेत, असे म्हणता येईल का? देशाच्या सुरक्षेच्या दृष्टिकोनातून काही योजनांची आखणी करण्यात आली आहे का? देशाच्या एकसंधतेला चार प्रमुख गोष्टींमुळे धोका आहे. नक्षलवाद्यांनी देशाच्या ४० टक्के भागामध्ये धुमाकूळ घातला आहे. जम्मू-काश्मीरमध्ये १९८८ पासून छुपे युद्ध सुरू आहे. हे राज्य देशाच्या स्वातंत्र्यापासून अक्षरश: लष्कराच्या ताब्यातच आहे.
