Answer:
<u>d) objective research</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
We need to note that mention was made that the research was "<em>Carefully controlled." </em>Been carefully controlled shows that the research has an objective.
Furthermore, measuring the reactions of consumers at different salt levels makes the research factual and thus a decision could be made from the findings.
Answer:
Assuming Simon’s AGI is $40,000.
Gambling losses are only deductible to the extent of gambling winnings. Thus,Simon cannot deduct any of the $4,300 gambling losses. The $3,160 transportation expenses are also nondeductible as they are deemed to be personal expenses. The $2,650 broker management fees are deductible as investment fees (miscellaneous itemized deductions subject to the 2% AGI floor), and the $1,030 tax return fees are also deductible as miscellaneous itemized deductions subject to the 2% AGI floor.
Thus, $2,650 + $1,030 – (2% x $40,000 AGI) = $2,880 deduction
Answer:
<em>c. puffery</em>
Explanation:
Puffery happens when <em>advertisers are trying to encourage people across different techniques to purchase a product or service.</em>
A business can send an amusing advertisement about its product, contrast the product to a similar item, mention product details, or make broad statements about the product that can not be proven to be true.
Answer:
meal option is cheaper with total cost = $2000 and hall only option is total cost $2700
Explanation:
given data
The meal option = $50 per person.
Hall free = $ 0 per person
total guest = 40
hall-only option = $1,500
external caterer = $30 per person
solution
when we go for meal option than hall free so total cost will be as
total cost = total guest × $50 per person
total cost = 40 × $50
total cost = $2000
and
when we go for hall only option than total cost will be
total cost = total guest × external caterer charge + hall-only option
total cost = 40 × $30 + $1500
total cost = $2700
so
meal option is cheaper with total cost = $2000 and hall only option is total cost $2700
Answer:
$38,000 Dividend
Explanation:
Based on the information given the tax treatment of the redemption to Marcie will be $38,000 dividend reason been that her husband shares was been attributed to her, and Since she owns 60 shares her remaining 10 shares including that of her husband 50 shares of Chestnut's will be 110 shares calculated as 150 shares - 40 shares outstanding.
Therefore when we look at this 60 shares/110 shares is greater than 50% which means that Marcie fails the 50% test which makes the redemption to be treated as a dividend.
Hence, the tax treatment of the basis of the shares redeemed will be $38,000 Dividend.
