answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kogti [31]
2 years ago
13

Daniel, my son, is exactly one fifth of my age. in 21 years time, i will be exactly twice his age. my wife is exactly seven time

s older than my daughter, jessica. in 8 years time, my wife will be three times older than jessica. how old are daniel and jessica now?
Mathematics
1 answer:
nydimaria [60]2 years ago
3 0
Let daniel's age = d and let jessica's age = j
let your current age = x and your wife's current age = y

x = 5d (given in question)
∴ x - 5d = 0

x + 21 = 2(d+21) (given in question)
∴ x + 21 = 2d + 42
∴ x - 2d = 21

We can solve these two rearranged equations simultaneously by multiplying the first equation by -1 and adding them. This gives us the following:

3d = 21
∴ d = 7

This means that daniel is currently 7 and (if we substitute d = 7 into one of the equations) you are 35. We use a similar method for your wife's and jessica's current ages.

y = 7j (given in question)
∴ y - 7j = 0

y + 8 = 3(j + 8)
∴y + 8 = 3j + 24
∴ y - 3j = 16

If we use a similar method of elimination we get this:

4j = 16
∴ j = 4

Hence, from this we can concur that daniel is 7 and jessica is 4.
You might be interested in
Carlos has 58 pencils what is the value of the digit 5 in this number
djverab [1.8K]
It would be 50 because the 5 is in the tens spot
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How many pounds of water must be evaporated from 50 pounds of a 3% salt solution so that the the remaining solution will be 5 %
svlad2 [7]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

This is kinda tricky, but not nearly as bad as d = rt problems. Those are a nightmare!

We will make a table for this:

                         #lbs solution           *          % salt         =           lbs. salt

  3% solution

-  <u>Water                                                                                                      </u>

New solution

And we will now fill in what we know. The 3% solution part is easy. The number of pounds of that is 50 and the percent salt in 3% salt is....well, 3%. As a decimal, it is .03:

                             #lbs solution        *        %salt        =        lbs salt

  3% solution                50                 *          .03         =           1.5

-  <u>Water                                                                                                 </u>

New solution

The last column there with a 1.5 in it is the product of 50 times .03, since that is what the formula at the top of the table tells us we have to use. Now for the water. That's easy, too, since the amount of water we are evaporating (notice the subtraction sign out front of the word "water"; that indicates we are removing water) is our unknown, and we also know that water has 0% salt in it:

                          #lbs solution         *       %salt        =        lbs. salt

   3% solution            50                  *         .03         =           1.5

-   <u>Water                       x                  *            0          =            0         </u>

New solution

Now all we have left is the new solution row and the equation. Finding the equation from a mixture table is as easy as it can be! Super easy!

The new solution will be 50 - x since, going down column 1, we are subtracting the water from the 3% solution, the % salt is to be 5%:

                            #lbs. solution        *       %salt        =        lbs. salt

   3% solution               50                *         .03          =           1.5

-   <u>Water                          x                 *           0           =            0         </u>

New solution         50 - x                  *         .05          =     2.5 - .05x

Now we're ready for our equation. I got the 2.5 - .05x from multiplying

.05(50 - x), just so you know.

if we had to subtract the water from the salt solution and set it equal to the new solution in the first column, we also have to do it in the third column:

1.5 - 0 = 2.5 - .05x and solve for x:

-1 = -.05x so

x = 20 pounds of water

4 0
2 years ago
Which statements about the hyperbola are true? Select two options.
timofeeve [1]

Answer:

The answer is B and E.

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Use the formula F = 1.8C + 32 to convert -10C into Fahrenheit
photoshop1234 [79]
Well since the value of C has been given to you, plug it into the equation.

F = 1.8(10) + 32
F = 18 +32
F = 50

The temperature in Fahrenheit would be 50 degrees.
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Gibbs Baby Food Company wishes to compare the weight gain of infants using its brand versus its competitor’s. A sample of 40 bab
Leviafan [203]

Answer:

z=\frac{(7.6-8.1)-0}{\sqrt{\frac{2.3^2}{40}+\frac{2.9^2}{55}}}}=-0.936  

The p value can be founded with this formula:

p_v =P(z  

Since the p value is higher than the significance level provided of 0.05 we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can't conclude that the true mean for the Gibbs brand is significantly lower than the true mean for the competitor

Step-by-step explanation:

Information given

\bar X_{1}=7.6 represent the mean for Gibbs products

\bar X_{2}=8.1 represent the mean for the competitor

\sigma_{1}=2.3 represent the population standard deviation for Gibbs

\sigma_{2}=2.9 represent the sample standard deviation for the competitor

n_{1}=40 sample size for the group Gibbs

n_{2}=55 sample size for the group competitor

\alpha=0.05 Significance level provided

z would represent the statistic

Hypothesis to verify

We want to check if babies using the Gibbs brand gained less weight, the system of hypothesis would be:  

Null hypothesis:\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}=0  

Alternative hypothesis:\mu_{1} - \mu_{2}< 0  

The statistic would be given by:

z=\frac{(\bar X_{1}-\bar X_{2})-\Delta}{\sqrt{\frac{\sigma^2_{1}}{n_{1}}+\frac{\sigma^2_{2}}{n_{2}}}} (1)  

Replacing the info given we got:

z=\frac{(7.6-8.1)-0}{\sqrt{\frac{2.3^2}{40}+\frac{2.9^2}{55}}}}=-0.936  

The p value can be founded with this formula:

p_v =P(z  

Since the p value is higher than the significance level provided of 0.05 we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can't conclude that the true mean for the Gibbs brand is significantly lower than the true mean for the competitor

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Sid need 0.6 meters of canvas material to make a carry-all bag for his wheelchair.if canvas is $10.09 per meter, how much will s
    15·1 answer
  • Work out the difference between 11/12 and 3/12.Give your answer in simplest form.
    7·2 answers
  • Find the value of x<br> .<br><br> 12.5,−10,−7.5,x<br> ; The mean is 11.5<br> .
    15·1 answer
  • Write three to five sentences explaining which levels of production provide Alonzo’s Cycling with the maximum profit.
    16·2 answers
  • Drag steps in the given order to evaluate this expression. (−3)(2)−7(−3)−10
    5·2 answers
  • Solve for x in the equation x squared + 14 x + 17 = negative 96. x = negative 7 plus-or-minus 4 StartRoot 6 EndRoot i x = –7 ± 8
    10·2 answers
  • Mrs. Dimitri purchased a case of yogurt cups. Out of every 10 yogurt cups, 6 are strawberry.
    9·1 answer
  • What is 55/99 rounded to the nearest half
    12·1 answer
  • The graph below represents the distance a pilot is from the home airport during a period of time. A graph titled Pilot's Distanc
    10·2 answers
  • 2. Compare the weather on two different days using an inequality. Then see if their comparisons change by finding the absolute v
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!