A. the insurance company's payment = $14,392
$18240 - $250 = 17990 x 80% = $14,392
b. <span>the 20% copayment
17990 * 20% = $3598
</span>
<span>c. Mary's total cost
$250 + $3598 = $3848
</span>
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
We would set up the hypothesis test. This is a test of a single population mean since we are dealing with mean
For the null hypothesis,
H0: µ = 5000
For the alternative hypothesis,
H1: µ > 5000
Since the population standard deviation is given, z score would be determined from the normal distribution table. The formula is
z = (x - µ)/(σ/√n)
Where
x = sample mean
µ = population mean
σ = population standard deviation
n = number of samples
From the information given,
µ = 5000
x = 5430
σ = 600
n = 40
z = (5430 - 5000)/(600/√40) = 4.53
Looking at the normal distribution table, the probability corresponding to the z score is < 0.0001
Since alpha, 0.05 > than the p value, then we would reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, at a 5% level of significance, it can be concluded that they walked more than the mean number of 5000 steps per day.
For product A, the product is increasing, for the bigger the number you plug into x (due to the fact that the numbers become bigger because of the time: year 1, year 2, etc)
Product A is 82% change rate, while
product B is 983.45/4 = 245.8625, 1756.16/3 = <span>585.3867</span>
Product B is 245.8625/585.3867
product B is 42% change rate
Product A change rate is higher than Product B by 40%
hope this helps
Answer:perpendicular bisector theorem
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Answer E
Step-by-step explanation
The statement gives a probability of approximately 0.022 for the difference in sample proportions, pˆA−pˆS, being greater than 0.
