Answer:
A.Leadership styles and behaviours
Explanation:
-Leadership styles and behaviours refer to the approach and actions a leader take to direct, motivate and guide people.
-Team processes refer to how the team works to accomplish goals.
-Team characteristics refer to the qualities that a group of people that work together possess.
-Leader power and influence refer to the ability a leader has to convince people to do certain things and achieve a goal.
According to this, the option that captures the specific actions that leaders take to influence others at work is leadership styles and behaviours.
A. allows you to diversify as opportunities develop.
Answer:
Price elasticity of demand = Change in Quantity/ Change in Price
Using midpoint formula;
Change in Quantity ;

Change in Price;

Price elasticity of demand = -0.342/0.118
= -2.90
Demand is elastic, so decreasing ticket prices will increase revenue.
When the elasticity is larger than 1 it means that a 1% change in price will change demand by more than 1%. In this case, a a decrease of price by 1% will bring 2.9% increase in customers.
Answer:
Limited Supply of lawyers will lead to increase in Lawyer Wages / Salaries
Explanation:
Labour Markets are at equilibrium where : Labour Demand (by firms) = Labour Supply (by employees).
Analysing the labour market for Lawyers : Previous anticipations finally leading to small graduating classes & limited supply of lawyers. This limited supply creates excess demand of lawyers. The mismatched excess demand (by firms) creates competition among buyer firms, which leads to increase in price (wages or salaries) of lawyers.
Answer:
The civil court filing must be dismissed because of the constitutional right against double jeopardy.
Explanation:
Double jeopardy is the legal concept that protects a person from being tried again for the same or similar charge following his aquittal or conviction.
Fred Arden has been tried in criminal court and found innocent. Shawn is trying to sue him again for the same act in civil court.
This is against the rule of double jeopardy.