answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nataly [62]
2 years ago
15

Identify three major consequences of european contact with american indians?

History
2 answers:
Papessa [141]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:  

The three major consequences of European contact with American Indians lead to the following three major changes:

Introduction of new diseases.

Introduction of new commodities through trade by Europeans.

Introduction of slavery in the native land.

Explanation:

The European explorations of North America during the 1500s lead to the exploration of the continent which was earlier unknown. The European contact with native American Indians spurred significant changes:

The European contact with native American Indians made them exposed to new diseases that Europeans had brought along with themselves.

The Europeans had brought along with themselves trade items and commodities which were new to native American Indians.

This trade resulted in the practice of slavery when the European settlers felt the need of employing man force in order to carry their trade.

Further explanation:

The European contact with native American Indians had spurred tremendous changes in the lives of native American Indians. The natives were exposed to new culture, environment, and practices which altogether influenced the habitat of native American Indians.  

The Europeans had carried along with themselves new diseases such as chickenpox, smallpox, influenza and measles. This affected the health of native American Indians as their immune systems could not prevent the effect of such deadly diseases when Europeans were used to it. These illnesses eventually resulted in the death of the major chunk of the native population.

Europeans had brought along with themselves new products and materials of daily use. These caught the attention of the native Americans who started getting fascinated with their products such as metal tools, weapons and clothes. This thus changed the trading pattern of the native population who started becoming dependent on European products.

Another significant change that the European settlement had brought was the practice of slavery where Europeans enslaved the native American Indians to indulge them into laborious tasks in their business and home. This gave rise to the slavery practice in the native land where the Europeans ultimately became bosses to the native population and confined them to inhumane existence.

 

Learn More:

  • Why did Columbus called the people he met in America as Indians , brainly.com/question/2110236 Answer by  Barbaralazarotto

 

  • Characteristics of American Indian prior to contact with Europeans , brainly.com/question/10904424 , Answered by MrDonovan

   

Keywords:  

European exploration, discovery of America, Red Indians, slavery in America, consequences of European contact, Culture of American Indians, consequences of European settlement  

 

taurus [48]2 years ago
7 0
European settlement had overwhelmingly negative outcomes for Native Americans. In spite of the fact that Native American tribes did sometimes frame positive associations with European pilgrims, perpetual European settlement in America, in the long run, prompted illness and removal. Local Americans had no in susceptibility to European sicknesses and their populace was crushed by the presentation of illnesses like smallpox. After some time, most surviving tribes were coercively migrated from their customary grounds to clear a path for extending European settlements.
You might be interested in
What could be Johnson’s reasoning for not further punishing Confederate leaders? What arguments could be made for supporting the
Yuliya22 [10]

Radicals believed that the safest approach was for the North to be a sort of dictator to the South. They were afraid that unless southerners' treason was harshly punished, the nation could never unite in a trustful bond that would guarantee their loyalty.

Even though Johnson had been outspoken about a need to punish the South, he ended up <u>extending a pardon</u> to all former confederates who declared a promise to stand by the Union and obey laws against slavery. <u>In addition, he let former confederate officials to occupy positions in state congress after the elections.</u>

When President Johnson started vetoing all laws that protected former slaves and black people in the south, it was made clear that ultimately he was trying to preserve the status quo and white privilege, and wasn't as forward-thinking as radicals had thought.


Hope this helps!

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following statements best describes the significance of the Proclamation Line of 1763 shown on this map?
const2013 [10]

Answer:

The Proclamation of 1763 allowed the American colonies to expand their trade with the nations of Europe.

Explanation:

This is true due to the fact that,Americans where not trading with the European Nations intially. It was as a result of this Proclamation that, it was made possible leading to the establishing of the trade relations between both continents.

3 0
2 years ago
Which diagram best describes the effect of Klondike gold rush
zaharov [31]
answer: to better help your understanding or help you with this question i need a picture
6 0
2 years ago
How did president Nixon and the u.s Supreme Court clash on school segregation?
andrey2020 [161]
Nixon enforced the Brown v. Board of Education ruling from 1954 which declared segregating school unconstitutional. 

Nixon created a task force to desegregate the schools still segregated in the South. By the end of Nixon's presidency only a few schools were left segregated. In this way, Nixon supported the Court and enforced their decision regarding school segregation. 
4 0
2 years ago
“In December 598 [B.C.] Nebuchadnezzar left Babylon once more to campaign in the west. He besieged Jerusalem, which had rebelled
Gekata [30.6K]

Answer:

30 months

During this siege, the duration of which was either 18 or 30 months (see below at "Chronological notes"), the Bible describes the city as enduring horrible deprivation (2 Kings 25:3; Lamentations 4:4, 5, 9).

Explanation:

8 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • The MOST significant reason Bantu people settled near rivers and lakes was
    12·2 answers
  • How could shifts in the physical environment have caused major changes in early civilizations? Select all that apply.
    5·2 answers
  • Which of these forms of transportation was not an innovation that used rails? the subway
    9·2 answers
  • In , russians marched to saint petersburg to demand reforms, but soldiers. this event is called. the tsar established a legislat
    15·2 answers
  • What were the results of Yugoslavia rejecting communism? Check all of the boxes that apply.
    10·2 answers
  • Owen Connelly claims that Napoleon "has become a legendary hero with worldwide appeal. Does he deserve to be called a hero? Why
    11·1 answer
  • 6. Which statement explains one way in which autocracy and direct democracy are different from each other?
    15·1 answer
  • What different approaches do Lord Redesdale and Ryunosuke Akutagawa take to writing about Buddhism?
    15·1 answer
  • Which of these items is NOT important to consider when selecting a credit card?
    5·1 answer
  • How was the shakya dynasty originated in nepal​
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!