<span>Employee of the Elder-Dempster shipping company based out of Antwerp. Responsible for basically starting the international human rights movement in the Congo Free State. Created the Congo Reform Association and was a constant thorn in the side of Leopold II. He formed his own newspaper 'The West African Mail' and wrote 'Red Rubber' to publicise the atrocities committed by King Leopold II and his officers in the Congo.</span>
I think that since it lives on the ocean floor, at the deepest of the ocean. So anyway, the fin on the Eurypterids is still necessary but not that much, since they live on the ocean floor. Their movements mostly on the ocean floor. So fin would not help them "stick" to the floor. Also there are still gravity acts on the Eurypterids and the feet would help them move faster. Hope this helps.
Answer:
tentatively group it with birds and speculate that the trait shared only with bats is a derived rather than an ancestral trait with bats.
Explanation:
The scientist after his observation should tentatively classify this organism with birds and the the second end of calculating the other morphological traits which makes it possess the likely bat traits to be ancestral.
According to scientists, most widely used modern systematic practice
depends upon the assumption that a change from character in one species
to character occurs once and once only in the evolutionary process and that this process is irreversible so that it never returns.
In this scheme, there are no independently derived parallel evolutionary changes,
nor convergences from a variety of states to a single one. Therefore, when two organisms share a
character state different from other species, it is because they are more closely related to each other through a recent common ancestor than they are to other species.
Also using the parsimony principle, a scheme of common ancestry for all the species is derived that uses all the characters that have been observed.
