Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
76.4
Answer:
Part A: From 0 to 2 seconds, the height of the water balloon increases from 60 to 75 feet, therefore the water balloon's height is increasing during the interval [0,2]
Part B: From 2 to 4 seconds, the height of the water balloon stays the same at 75 feet, therefore the water balloon's height is the same during the interval [2,4] From 10 to 12 seconds, the height of the water balloon stays the same at 0 feet, therefore the water balloon's height is the same during the interval [10,12] From 12 to 14 seconds, the height of the water balloon stays the same at 0 feet, therefore the water balloon's height is the same during the interval [12,14]
Part C: The interval, [4,6] of the domain is when the water ballon's height decreases the fastest. The interval [4,6] decreases by 35 feet. The two other intervals that decrease are [6,8] and [8,10] which both have the same slope. They decrease by 20 feet. Therefore, this helps us conclude that the interval [4,6] decreases the fastest because 35 feet is a more significant decrease than 20 feet.
Part D: I predict that the height of the water balloon at 16 seconds is 0 feet. This is because at 10-14 seconds, the water balloon's height is 0 feet. In read-world situations, if the water balloon is on the ground which is 0 feet, it stays on the ground due to gravity.
Step-by-step explanation:
I hope this helps! I also do not know if it is all correct but I did research and everything so hopefully it is correct! Good luck!
Answer: The exponents in the prime factorization are 2, 1, and 1. Adding one to each and multiplying we get (2 + 1)(1 + 1)(1 + 1) = 3 x 2 x 2 = 12. Therefore 315 has exactly 12 factors.
Step-by-step explanation: First, the exponents in the prime factorization are 2, 1, and 1. Then adding one to each and multiplying we get (2 + 1)(1 + 1)(1 + 1) = 3 x 2 x 2 = 12. Finally, 315 has exactly 12 factors.
The study of explanatory or independent differences based on the dependent variable is a simple statistical method. The correlation between two variables is researched in which only the explanatory variable of them would be present, and the further discussion can be defined as follows:
For point (i):
- The log(distances) seem to be optimistic, and their valuation is 0.312, which also means that the cost of a house will rise even as the distance increases.
- In this, the certainly is what everybody expects the better the house from the sewage treatment is from a hygienic viewpoint.
For point (ii):
- In this regard, we cannot use straightforward regression, even as non-biased price estimation might not even be provided.
- The price-distance relationship here is not so much linear.
For point (iii):
- Several factors influence the house's price, the biggest contributor is house length, market nearness or public areas, number of rooms, etc.
- Thus the only influence is not the mere distance from the incinerator. It's one of the factors affecting housing pricing.
- The proximity of markets and places can be connected to the distance from the crematorium.
- However, factors such as house size and the number of stories aren't related to the distance from the incineration plant.
Learn more:
brainly.com/question/19729277
