Answer:
Set target for a statistically significant improvement compared to the current value.
Explanation:
For programs that are innovative, address rare health problems, or are highly tailored to the location a target of value of a statistically significant improvement compared to the current value is set. It is appropriate when there is credible data source and policy makers need to be convinced on an investment that is worthwhile. Also, change can happen anytime and planners must be able to set an argument that greater change will most likely occur by chance alone. The Z-test is used to determine the amount of change that is statistically significant. Very often, the significance level is set at p= 0.05 which implies that the probability of reaching the target by chance alone is 5% or less than 5 in 100 which translates to a Z-score of 1.96 which is used to estimate the target value.
This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is as follows:
Timothy, a brilliant investment banker, makes millions each year. He is not very good-looking, but he marries a beautiful, young supermodel. In the context of physical attractiveness, Timothy and his wife most likely exhibit ________ in this scenario.
A. asset matching
B. the ingratiation effect
C. the spotlight effect
D. the mere- exposure effect
Answer:
Timothy and his wife most likely exhibit A. asset matching in this scenario.
Explanation:
Asset matching is a phenomenon observed by psychologists in matching hypothesis. The matching hypothesis concerns the preference individuals display to form relationships with those who resemble them. Resemblance can come in a variety of attributes, such as age, education level, social status, ethnicity, personality traits, values, physical appearance, etc. Asset matching happens because people tend to select partners whose assets are similar to their own. Timothy and his supermodel wife are both wealthy people, which characterizes their selection of each other as asset matching. That wouldn't be the case, however, if Timothy had married a working class woman.
Answer:
This is known as Economic Duress
Explanation:
Economic duress in contracts is said to occur when a party to a contract threatens to cancel a contract unless the other party involved agrees to their demands. Phillip refusing to go on stage unless he is paid an additional $5000 put Dalynda under economic duress as that was an abrupt decision made by Phillip just at the very minute when his service was needed the most.
Difference: puritans wanted to make chnages to the church of england not fully leave it but pilgrims wanted to seperate from the church of england
Similarity: seperatists and went to america to practice religious freedom in america and escape religious persecution
