In ABC, AB=5, BC=9, and AC=8. choose the angle measures in order from greatest to least.

If 2 tacos and 5 drinks cost $20, And three tacos and five drinks cost $25 how much does a taco cost

san4es73 [151]

A taco costs $5
This is because there was no difference in the cost except for $5. The only item added was one taco. Drinks cost $2 each.

4 0

1 year ago

at the game, mrs. burns spent $45 for 4 soft pretzels, 3 bags of peanuts, and 8 bottles of water for snacks for the family. a bo

Irina18 [472]

Answer:

The correct statements are A. The cost of a bottle of water is p – 0.75, C. The cost of a soft pretzel is $3.25. and D. The cost of a bag of peanuts is $4.00.

Step-by-step explanation:

1. This is the information given to solve the case:

Amount spent by Mrs. Burns at the game = US$ 45

Detailed purchase done by Mrs. Burns = 4 soft pretzels, 3 bags of peanuts and 8 bottles of water.

Price of soft pretzel = p

Price of bag of peanuts = p + US$ 0.75

Price of bottle of water = p - US$ 0.75

2. This is the equation for solving the case:

4p + 3(p + 0.75) + 8(p - 0.75) = 45

4p + 3p + 2.25 + 8p - 6 = 45

4p + 3p + 8p = 45 + 6 - 2.25

15p = 48.75

p = 3.25

The price of a soft pretzel is US$ 3.25, of a bag of peanuts is US$ 4 (3.25 + 0.75) and of a bottle of water is US$ 2.50 (3.25 - 0.75).

3. Now, we have all the information necessary to analyze the statements.

A. The cost of a bottle of water is p – 0.75. It's correct.

B. The equation that represents this scenario is (p – 0.75) + (p – 0.75) + p = 45. It's false.

C. The cost of a soft pretzel is $3.25. It's correct.

D. The cost of a bag of peanuts is $4.00. It's correct.

E. The cost of 8 bottles of water is $26.00. It's false. (8 * 2.50 = 20)

The correct statements are A. The cost of a bottle of water is p – 0.75, C. The cost of a soft pretzel is $3.25. and D. The cost of a bag of peanuts is $4.00.

5 0

1 year ago

Read 2 more answers

A law school administrator was interested in whether a student's score on the entrance exam can be used to predict a student's g

frutty [35]

Answer:

The correlation coeffcient for this case was provided:

r =0.934

And this coefficient is very near to 1 the maximum possible value, so then we can interpret that the relationship between the entrace exam score and the grade point average are strongly linearly correlated .

We can also find the $r^2$ who represent the determination coefficient and we got:

$r^2 = 0.934^2= 0.872$

And the interpretation for this is that a linear model explains appproximately 87.2% of the variability between the two variables

Step-by-step explanation:

Previous concepts

The correlation coefficient is a "statistical measure that calculates the strength of the relationship between the relative movements of two variables". It's denoted by r and its always between -1 and 1.

And in order to calculate the correlation coefficient we can use this formula:

$r=\frac{n(\sum xy)-(\sum x)(\sum y)}{\sqrt{[n\sum x^2 -(\sum x)^2][n\sum y^2 -(\sum y)^2]}}$

The correlation coeffcient for this case was provided:

r =0.934

And this coefficient is very near to 1 the maximum possible value, so then we can interpret that the relationship between the entrace exam score and the grade point average are strongly linearly correlated .

We can also find the $r^2$ who represent the determination coefficient and we got:

$r^2 = 0.934^2= 0.872$

And the interpretation for this is that a linear model explains appproximately 87.2% of the variability between the two variables

8 0

1 year ago

It is known that driving can be difficult in regions where winter conditions involve snow-covered roads. For cars equipped with

noname [10]

Answer:

The null and alternative hypothesis for this test are

$H_0: \mu\ge 215\\\\H_1: \mu< 215$

Step-by-step explanation:

If we perform a hypothesis test, we can reject or not reject the null hypothesis.

To conclude that the tires have a decreased stopping distance (μ<215), we should state the null hypothesis $H_0: \mu\ge 215$ and then go on with the analysis to reject it (or not).

If the null hypothesis is rejected, the claim of the manufacturer is rigth.

The alternative hypothesis would be $H_1: \mu$ , that would turn rigth if the null hypothesis is rejected.

5 0

2 years ago

Alicia sews costumesfor a school play.She takes an average of 86 minutes to sew each costume.How long would she take to sew 16 o

Goryan [66]

Answer:

1376 minutes

Step-by-step explanation:

Alicia sews costumes for schools

She takes 86 minutes to sew one costume

Therefore the time taken to sew 16 costumes can be calculated as follows

86 mins= 1 costume

x= 16 costume

Cross multiply

x= 86×16

= 1376 minutes

3 0

1 year ago