B in my option you should always have a back up plan but it's also very important to commit when you've found something that you enjoy and are capable of doing.
Answer:
Her kitchen Staff can spend up to $3.00 on product cost.
Explanation:
Selling price= $10.00
Margin= $4.00
Labor costs = $10.00*30% = $3.00
Selling Price = Contribition margin + Labor costs + Product Cost.
Isolating Product cost from the equation:
Product cost = Selling price - (Contribution margin + Labor costs)
Product cost = $ 10.00 - ($4.00 + $3.00)
Product cost = $ 10.00 - $7.00
Product cost = $ 3.00
The max. amount that kitchen staff can spend on product cost is: $ 3.00
Answer:
c.) 82,000
Explanation:
We know that,
The ending work in progress units = Beginning work in process inventory + Units started in production - Units completed and transferred
7,000 dolls = 4,000 dolls + Units started in production - 79,000 dolls
7,000 dolls = -75,000 dolls + Units started in production
So, Units started in production = 75,000 dolls + 7,000 dolls
= 82,000
Explanation:
1. Ragged mountains assertion of defense is '<u>assumption of risk</u><u>'</u><u>.</u><u> </u>In this scenario, Elaine Sweeney exposed herself to risk while snow tubing at the absence of an instructor. snow tube run is solely for snow tubers. ragged mountain can use this defense
2. new hampshire has prohibited people from suing for injuries received due to skiing risks. in a case of this sort, ms Elaine would be assumed to know all possible risks involved. the defendant will be favored since it has been advised that people should not go into sports of these sorts witout good training and an instructor.
3. no Elaine's lawsuit will not be successful if the conclusion of the court is that the statue applies to skiing and not to snow tubing. one should be cautious during snow tubing. she went snow tubing without proper care. it is likely that she may not win the case.
4. the theory is <u>contributor</u><u>y</u><u> </u><u>neglige</u><u>nce</u><u> </u><u>theor</u><u>y</u><u>.</u><u> </u>her damages is going to be reduced in proportion with the actions that has brought about her accident. for this reason she is partly responsible.
Answer:
Limited liability partnership (LLP) or a limited liability company (LLC)
Explanation:
Both the LLP and LLC provide limited liability to the owners and they are both pass through tax entities. That means that they are not directly taxed, instead their owners are taxed.
Depending on where Tina and Aaliyah live, they might not be able to open a LLP, and instead they will need to start a LLC. Any of them will satisfy their needs, but starting a LLC is a little bit more complicated and can cost more money. An LLC is usually better if there are several partners, but in this case if they can avoid the cost of opening a LLC it would be better for them.
