20 pounds of lollipops. 20 x .95 = 19, 10 x 1.1 = 11. sorry i'm awful at explaining math.
Answer:
a) Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
b)
(1)
Replacing we got:
The p value for this case would be given by:
c) For this case we see that the p value is higher than the significance level of 0.05 so then we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can't conclude that the true proportion workers belonged to unions is significantly higher than 11.3%
Step-by-step explanation:
Information given
n=400 represent the random sample taken
X=52 represent the workers belonged to unions
estimated proportion of workers belonged to unions
is the value that we want to test
represent the significance level
Confidence=95% or 0.95
z would represent the statistic
represent the p value
Part a
We want to test if the true proportion of interest is higher than 0.113 so then the system of hypothesis are.:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
Part b
The statistic is given by:
(1)
Replacing we got:
The p value for this case would be given by:
Part c
For this case we see that the p value is higher than the significance level of 0.05 so then we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can't conclude that the true proportion workers belonged to unions is significantly higher than 11.3%
Answer:
0.3114
Option d is right
Step-by-step explanation:
Let X be the time spent on a treadmill in the health club
Given that research shows that on average, patrons spend an average of 42.5 minutes on the treadmill, with a standard deviation of 5.4 minutes
Also given that X is normal
the probability that randomly selected individual would spent between 30 and 40 minutes on the treadmill.

round off to two decimals tog et
the probability that randomly selected individual would spent between 30 and 40 minutes on the treadmill is 0.31
Hence option d is right
Answer:
D. The difference of the means is not significant because the re-randomizations show that it is within the range of what could happen by chance.
Step-by-step explanation:
The treatment group using System A reported a mean of 18.5 lost bags per day. The treatment group using System B reported a mean of 16.6 lost bags per day.
The best conclusion that can be made is - The difference of the means is not significant because the re-randomizations show that it is within the range of what could happen by chance.
As we know, in statistics, nothing happens by chance. So, this option is correct.