The answer to this question is <span>object permanence
</span><span>object permanence refers to the understanding that an object will still remain in a place even though we stop observing it directly.
</span>This psychological phenomenon is the one that make children think their parents is disappearing when they're playing peek-a-boo.
Answer:
Electic approach.
Explanation:
This is explained to be an integrative counselling approach where the different theories are been fused together to solve a clinical and psychological issue. It is particularly seen to contain human complexity properly without to dissect or have their mental record been set straight before the therapy. This psychological approach also gives patients the room to try focusing on themselves totally by getting proper assistance with of their challenges from the same therapist.
It also gives therapist a detailed picture of the patient he is dealing instead of making assumptions on several unknown factors.
Answer:
It is not that doctors arent accepting...but those people who just think money mindedly dont even put camps in rural areas ...they just think of profits and dont care about welfare ..
but on the other side there are doctors who just work as in rural areas and think of people welfare.
Explanation:
Hope this helps
Answer:
The person is using the B. Yale attitude change approach.
Explanation:
The Yale attitude change approach suggests that an individual is most likely to <em>change his/her attitudes</em> due to persuasive messages.
There are many factors which should be taken into account , such as the <em>attractiveness</em> of the individual giving the message, the <em>attention and quality </em>of the message, amongst others.
In this case, we can see that the individual is saying that actors make effective spoke people for potato chips based on their attractiveness, meaning that an individual is most likely to change his/her attitude about the chips based on this factor.
Answer:
I think the central idea of the passage is that the family Otzi's father is common in Europe.
Explanation:
My justification for my answer is that his DNA kind of matched the one of the people living in the Neolithic Age. This shows that maybe he was a descendant of those people.
I think the first answer is wrong because people of the Neolithic Age were from the past and I don't think DNA existed by then.
And the think the second is wrong because his mother's family was just rare it wasn't complex.
Finally the last is wrong because the DNA wasn't so hard to test it was also easy to compare it because there were other samples to be compared with.
That leaves us with the last answer as correct.
HOPE IT HELPED
