Answer:
The answer is "All people in the US".
Explanation:
- The united states federal department whose purpose is to prevent human safety through the prevention and treatment of illness, injury, and chronic illness.
- It's Center for Controls and cure of infection support healthy behaviors and safe, healthy communities, that's why all people of the US is reasonable for generalize findings from the NHANES
Below are some traffic safety and streets issues facing communities: ... road accident - 40% of the road accident is caused by street lighting. it should be improved into more visible from drivers. increase the number of road humps, this is for drivers who falls asleep while driving.
Answer:
Andrew Carnegie was extremely wealthy having built a personal fortune from steel. He was a philanthropist and believed in giving back to the community but he still maintained control of where and how to donate. The kind of projects he prioritized did little to directly help the class of people who struggle daily like coal miners.
Explanation:
Andrew Carnegie was known as a philanthropist, he felt it was his duty or obligation to give back to the community as a wealthy person. But he was also the wealthiest man in the world in 1901 when he retired. There is a big disparity between his life and the life of average coal miner who had to struggle in the mines and risked their health and lives because the earnings were a bit higher than other options for the poorer or working class at the time, particularly where there was coal mining in the Appalachians and around Pittsburgh, for example. This philanthropic view was not ethical because it was the wealthy man himself who still decided where the money was to be donated or invested and in the kind of services it would provide. Carnegie donated to museums and libraries in the Pittsburgh area for example, and while valuable in themselves they do little to improve the quality of life for working class people directly, like coal miners. Although Carnegie did respond personally to some families in the Harwick Mine Disaster for example, having medals privately minted for the families of two miners who gave their lives trying to save the others. Carnegie also gave $5 million to establish a Carnegie Hero Fund (note how the gesture was branded in the sense even in giving it carries the Carnegie name). But 181 people died in that accident that was indicative of other sacrifices many countless other coal miners made to help amass his personal fortune.
Psychodynamics, also known as psychodynamic psychology, in its broadest sense, is an approach to psychology that emphasizes systematic study of the psychological forces that underlie human behavior, feelings, and emotions and how they might relate to early experience. It is especially interested in the dynamic relations between conscious motivation and unconscious motivation.[1]
The term psychodynamics is also used by some to refer specifically to the psychoanalytical approach developed by Sigmund Freud (1856–1939) and his followers. Freud was inspired by the theory of thermodynamics and used the term psychodynamics to describe the processes of the mind as flows of psychological energy (libido) in an organically complex brain.[2]
There are 4 different schools of thought regarding psychological treatment: Psychodynamic, cognitive-behavioral, biological, and humanistic treatment. In the treatment of psychological distress, psychodynamic psychotherapy tends to be a less intensive, once- or twice-weekly modality than the classical Freudian psychoanalysis treatment of 3-5 sessions per week. Psychodynamic therapies depend upon a theory of inner conflict, wherein repressed behaviours and emotions surface into the patient’s consciousness; generally, one's conflict is subconscious.[3] Psychodynamic psychotherapies are considered outdated, compared to cognitive-behavioral and interpersonal therapies.
The authors imply that the "first group of initiatives" would primarily take both positive and negative factors into account throughout, without rejection.
<u>Explanation: </u>
The first group of initiatives is seen as a group of initiatives that tries to deal with downsides of having a figure like GDP by attempting to try to fix the indicators of GDP from the base. The key objective these group of measures include is the act of accounting for the environmental damage and the sustainability associated with the given GDP growth.
It puts forward that the consequence of the economic growth and other forms of modernization need to be acknowledged while needing to retain the features and benefits that come with the GDP. Thus, the positive and negative factors needing to be taken into account while keeping in mind not to reject any.
