This is an example of Ad Hominem, which is a argument that is directed against a person rather than the position that they are in.<span />
Answer:
Moches: Well developed and established irrigation channels and creation of labor classes
Chimus: Planning to build cities, messaging system.
Explanation:
Moches and Chimus are civilizations that predated the Incas, but that contributed in a great way to the establishment and success of the Inca culture.
The moches influenced the Incas to develop and establish efficient irrigation channels that would allow an advance in agriculture, generating more wealth and an efficient trade. It also influenced the creation of labor classes, allowing the collection of taxes to be equivalent to social class and that no one could be exploited.
The Chimus, in turn, influenced the Incas to plan the construction of new cities very well, with major works that showed the wealth of the empire, in addition to providing comfort to the population. They also influenced a system for transmitting messages through corridors, which was very modern and efficient at the time.
The answer below may help in solving the problem stated above:
The older waiter's attitude would fit Hemingway's.
Explanation:
The younger waiter shows anger and is not understanding of the old man but the older waiter can relate to him. The younger waiter seemed to be annoyed by the old man and appeared to just want to go home.
Answer: From Piaget's theory of cognitive development, The concept of Object Permanence.
Explanation:Object Permanence, for the baby means that he is starting to understand that things can disappear although they aren't gone forever.
Since Jonathan's mom left him he began to cry because he did not want her to leave although he knows she won't be gone forever.
Answer:
This type of research is field research.
Explanation:
Field research is a <em>qualitative method</em> in which the researcher observes his/her subjects in their context. It aims to <em>understand and interpret</em> the subjects' behaviors and social interactions.
In this case, we can see that Carla is doing field research since, in order to test her hypothesis, she goes to the subjects' social context and observes in order to prove or rebuff it.