Answer:
we cannot conclude hat the proportion of wives married less than two years who planned to have children is significantly higher than the proportion of wives married five years
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that in a study on the fertility of married women conducted by Martin O’Connell and Carolyn C. Rogers for the Census Bureau in 1979, two groups of childless wives aged 25 to 29 were selected at random, and each was asked if she eventually planned to have a child. One group was selected from among wives married less than two years and the other from among wives married five years.
Let X be the group married less than 2 years and Y less than 5 years
X Y Total
Sample size 300 300 600
Favouring 240 288 528
p 0.8 0.96 0.88
p difference = -0.16
Std error for difference = 
Test statistic = p difference/std error=-6.03
p value <0.000001
Since p is less than alpha 0.05 we cannot conclude hat the proportion of wives married less than two years who planned to have children is significantly higher than the proportion of wives married five years
Compab=a.b/|a|
b=<0,1,−2√10>
a.b= 2√10
|a| = √10
a.b/|a|=2√10 / √10=2
Assuming you mean y=10x+150 and y=20x+115, you need to use a simultaneous equation, because you have two equations with two unknowns (x and y)
rearrange so
10x-y=-150
20x-y=-115
multiply the top by -1, so that if we add the two lines together, the y will cancel out
-10x+y=150
20x-y=-115
add the two lines together
10x=35
x=3.5
so the time is 3 and a half weeks
then we can sub in x to find y
20x-y=-115
20(3.5)-y=-115
70-y=-115
-y=-185
y=185
so 185 tickets were sold !
you can sub these values into your original equations to check your answer :)
F(x) = [x] - 2 + 8
[x] is the notation for 'greatest integer function'
f(-1.8) = [-1.8] - 2 + 8 = -2 -2 + 8 = 4
The answer is 4
General Idea:
The relationship between rate(R), distance(D) and time(T) given below:
Applying the concept:
We need to make use of the formula to find Kelly's walking rate before and after her snack
Option A isn't correct because before snack Kelly walking rate is not 4/14 miles per hour.
Option B is <u>Correct,</u> Kelly walking rate after snack is 2 2/3 miles per hour.
Option C isn't correct because it doesn't took Kelly 2 hours longer to walk 1/6 mile than it did for her to walk 1/4 mile. It took 1/112 hour longer.
Option D isn't correct because 2 2/3 miles per hour is slower than 3 1/2 miles per hour.
Conclusion:
Option B is <u>Correct,</u> Kelly walking rate after snack is 2 2/3 miles per hour.
