12h + 30w.....where h = hrs worked and w = wagons sold
so if an employee works 6 hrs and sells 3 wagons....then h = 6 and w = 3
12h + 30w
12(6) + 30(3) =
72 + 90 = $ 162 <==
38 < 4x + 3 +7 - 3x (original equation)
38 < 4x - 3x + 3 + 7 (combine like terms)
38 < x + 10 (simplify)
38 - 10 < x + 10 - 10 (subtract 10 from both sides to get (x) alone)
28 < x (simplify)
x > 28 (switch to get x on the left (its proper equation writing >.<) )
2.5y + 1.1x ∠ 10
2.5y = - 1.1x +10
y = (- 1.1/2.5)x + 4
Draw this function. It's descending (m negative). All values on the left of the lines satisfy this inequality
we have
Step 
<u>Clear the variable y</u>
Adds 
both sides
Step 
<u>Convert in function notation</u>
Let
therefore
<u>the answer is</u>
Answer:
The null and alternative hypothesis for this test are
Step-by-step explanation:
If we perform a hypothesis test, we can reject or not reject the null hypothesis.
To conclude that the tires have a decreased stopping distance (μ<215), we should state the null hypothesis 
and then go on with the analysis to reject it (or not).
If the null hypothesis is rejected, the claim of the manufacturer is rigth.
The alternative hypothesis would be 
, that would turn rigth if the null hypothesis is rejected.
