Answer:
visionary leader
Explanation:
Hello! Stephen is the kind of leaders who promote and spread positive proposals, promoting a feeling that the progress can be correctly made, that it will be achieved, and in a group, all together. He speaks with that conviction to his employees with the aim of reaching successful results.
Thanks for your question!
Answer:
c. You present the problem to your group at a meeting, define the problem and its boundaries, and then encourage discussion as your group members make the decision.
Explanation:
The Vroom model is way to identify the best approach you can take towards a decision.
The delegation model is basically a model which represents democracy, in which the opinions are collected from all the individuals and then a final decision is taken.
Hence I believe option 'C' is the only option which fits bests on the way the delegate style works.
Hope this helps.
Thanks.
In spite of the wealth of the country Colombia and its natural resources such as coffee, emeralds and coal, Colombia has a turbulent history which caused a turmoil. And the answer to the given question is letter C. Powerful drug cartels and guerilla groups.
Answer:
Conference Committee
Explanation:
The Congress has many committees which help ease its many functions. One of these committees is the "Conference Committee."
This committee has been designated by the Senate and the House of Representatives<u> in order to settle disputes and reconcile pieces of similar legislation when the U.S. House and Senate pass two similar bills.</u>
The members in this house is majorly comprised of senior members who are knowledgeable. Its role is to solve the indifference of both groups, so that it can pass the legislation in identical form before passing to the President. They prevent the occurrence of disputes that could turn into bigger issues in the future.
Answer:
The correct answer is d) stare decisis
.
Explanation:
The doctrine of stare decisis is mostly used by Europeans; It has the function of establishing a precedent for future decisions in a sentence since it creates an antecedent with the determination made by the court on the verdict.
Future cases should take into account the opinion of the previous examples.
For many, this is a way to create impartiality in future cases, and they disagree that this doctrine will continue to apply.
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
