<u>Answer:</u>
x = 4 (extraneous solution)
<u>Step-by-step explanation:</u>

This solution is extraneous. Reason being that even if it can be solved algebraically, it is still not a valid solution because if we substitute back
, we will get two fractions with zero denominator which would be undefined.
Answer:
The third and fourth options.
Step-by-step explanation:
You simplify the inequality first...
-6x + 15 < 10 - 5x
-x < -5
x > 5
The first option is incorrect since it is less than.
The second option is basically -5x < 15; x > -3; that's incorrect.
The third option is basically -x < -5; x > 5; that is correct!
The fourth option is correct since it shows more than 5.
The fifth option is incorrect because it shows less than -5.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
I might be wrong but I think this is the answer 10460353203
Step-by-step explanation:

for all
![x\in[0,\pi]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=x%5Cin%5B0%2C%5Cpi%5D)
, while

for

and

for

. So you already know that

over the second half of the interval.
In the first half,

is an increasing function, from

to

. Meanwhile

is a decreasing function, from

to

. Therefore there must be a point between 0 and

where the two curves intersect. So we find it:

So we know that

in

, and

in
![\left(\arctan\dfrac52,\pi\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%28%5Carctan%5Cdfrac52%2C%5Cpi%5Cright%5D)
.
The area between the curves is then