Am presuming you are looking for the two insects.
In rounding up to nearest whole number, you look at the number before the decimal point, if the number after that is 5 or more, you add up one extra to the digit before the decimal point.
When you round up bumblebee 2.861 to the nearest whole number you have 3.
When you round up honeybee 2.548 to the nearest whole number you have 3.
The two insects are bumblebee and honeybee.
No other two are equal when rounded up to the nearest whole number.
Let us convert all figures into decimals so that we can compare them easily.
Monday 0.3
Tuesday 15% = 0.15
Wednesday 1/6 = 0.1666
Thursday 0.2
Friday 1/8 = 0.125
Clearly, I spent the least amount of time on Friday using IT and the time is 0.125 or 1/8.
Answer:
$2.64
Step-by-step explanation:
Selling them at 5 cents each ($0.05), he could sell 1 dozen buttons for
12 * $0.05 = $0.60
As he bought them at $0.38 per dozen, the profit per dozen would be
$0.60 - $0.38 = $0.22
As 12 dozen is 1 gross, the profit per gross would be
12 * $0.22 = $2.64
Answer:
There is enough evidence to support the claim that the true proportion of monitors with dead pixels is greater than 5%.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 300
p = 5% = 0.05
Alpha, α = 0.05
Number of dead pixels , x = 24
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
This is a one-tailed(right) test.
Formula:
Putting the values, we get,
Now, we calculate the p-value from excel.
P-value = 0.00856
Since the p-value is smaller than the significance level, we fail to accept the null hypothesis and reject it. We accept the alternate hypothesis.
Conclusion:
Thus, there is enough evidence to support the claim that the true proportion of monitors with dead pixels is greater than 5%.
Answer:
<u>The correct answer is D. Any amount of time over an hour and a half would cost $10.</u>
Step-by-step explanation:
f (t), when t is a value between 0 and 30
The cost is US$ 0 for the first 30 minutes
f (t), when t is a value between 30 and 90
The cost is US$ 5 if the connection takes between 30 and 90 minutes
f (t), when t is a value greater than 90
The cost is US$ 10 if the connection takes more than 90 minutes
According to these costs, statements A, B and C are incorrect. The connection doesn't cost US$ 5 per hour like statement A affirms, the cost of the connection isn't US$ 5 per minute after the first 30 minutes free as statement B affirms and neither it costs US$ 10 for every 90 minutes of connection, as statement C affirms. <u>The only one that is correct is D, because any amount of time greater than 90 minutes actually costs US$ 10.</u>
