Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Given a set of data sorted from smallest to largest, i.e. arranged in ascending order we are to find out the median, I and III quartiles
We know that the median is the middle entry of data arranged in ascending order
Q1 is the entry below which 25% lie and Q3 is one above which 25% lie
Hence proper definition would be
d. The first quartile is the median of the lower half of the data below the overall median.
The second quartile is the overall median
The third quartile is the median of the upper half of the data above the overall median.
Option b is wrong becuase mean is not necessary here. Option a is wrong because this has nothing to do with std deviation
Option c is wrong since minimum value cannot be q1
Option e is wrong because we have exactly 25% lie below Q1
Answer:
with 0.10 level of significance the P-VALUE that would be used in the hypothesis claim is 0.05%
Step-by-step explanation:
In hypothesis testing in statistics, we can say that the p-value is a probability of obtaining test results when we assume that the null hypothesis is correct.
The p-value is the probability that the null hypothesis is true.
A p-value less than or equals to 0.05 is statistically significant. It shows strong evidence against the null hypothesis, meaning there is less than a 5% probability the null is correct and clearly we can say that the results are random.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
We'll call height h.
The equations of a cone and sphere are:
Cones: 1/3 * base area * h
Spheres: 4/3 π * r³
The base area of a cone would be the area of a circle equation:
π * r² = π * 2² = 4π.
Because you're converting from sphere to cone, you would set their equations equal to each other.
1/3 * 4π * h = 4/3 π * 5³
Next, isolate h.
h = (4/3 π * 5³)/(1/3 * 4π)
h = 125
Hope this helps!
Your best decision would be to find a subject that the entire grade has so it is not biased such as a course class like science or language arts depending on what grade they are referring to if this is not the answer you where looking for I am sorry hope I helped :)
Answer:
It is incorrect
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement is incorrect because 4 is a perfect square and perfect squares always have a odd number of factors so 4 can not possibly have 4 factors.
