Answer:
The explanation for the aggression is consistent with the social learning theory by Albert Bandura.
Explanation:
The psychologist Albert Bandura was interested on the basis of human interaction and made the famous <em>Bobo doll experiment. </em>
The experiment consisted on testing the imitation influence, specially of aggression behavior, in two groups of children.<em> </em>The first group was in a non-aggressive environment. The kids of the second group watched several times their teacher kicking and hitting, also insulting, a Bobo doll (an inflatable toy with painted image of a doll). In both groups, after spending some time in their respective environment, the teacher gave them the Bobo doll. The results showed that most of the kids, in the second group (with the aggressive environment) were more liable to also kicked and hit the toy, as seen with the teacher; while, on the other hand, most kids of the first group were not.
Based on this experiment, prof. Bandura developed the social learning theory that supports that, both children and adults learn and develop disposition to do certain things by imitation, based on the behavior that they observe in others. Prof. Bandura emphasizes that aggression is a very imitable behavior.
This is why the explanation given by Johnny's parents about his behavior is consistent with the social learning theory, because they are recognizing violent behavior in the video games that Johnny constantly watches and plays. So, his parents are saying that he is acting aggressively because he is imitating the behavior shown and experienced in the video games.
Hello. This question is incomplete. Full question is:
Read the fictitious killer Robot case found at the web site for the Online Ethics Center for Engineering & Science.
The case begins with the incitement of a programmer for manslaughter for writing a faulty code that resulted in the death of a robot operator. Slowly, over the course of many articles, you are introduced to several factors within the corporation that contributed to the accident. Read the case and answer the following questions:
Responsibility for an accident is rarely defined clearly and is often difficult to trace to one or two people or causes. In this fictitious case, it is clear that a large number of people share responsibility for the accident. Identify all the people you think were at least partially responsible for the death of Bart Matthews, and explain why you think so.
Answer and Explanation:
When reading the case indicated in the question above, we can see that it is a case where a poorly programmed industrial robot killed its operator. In this case, we can point out that the programmers of this robot are the first culprits. This is because the robot in question exhibited a violent and dangerous behavior that could have been avoided with correct programming and effective tests. This shows that the programmers did not have enough knowledge and experience to work on this project. This makes us able to point out other culprits that is the company that hired the programmers called Silicon Techtronics, as well as the manager and responsible for the project because it had the obligation to assess the degree of professionalism of the programmers, as well as ensuring the safety of employees.
Since, the options are not given the question is incomplete the complete question is as follows:
Consider the machine from the previous question. If you were responsible for tuning this machine, what evaluation metric would you want to maximize to ensure all criminals (people about to commit a crime) are imprisoned (where crime is the positive label)?
A. Sensitivity
B. Specificity
C. Accuracy
D. Area under curve
Answer: A. Sensitivity
Explanation:
The person is imprisoned the person can be considered criminal. To ensure the fact that all criminal people are about to commit the crime are imprisoned we have to maximize the sensitivity, thus the crime here can be considered as a positive label.
Hence, based on the above description, option A. Sensitivity is correct.
Answer:
norms
Explanation:
Social norms, or customs, are unwritten behavioral guidelines that are deemed acceptable in a community or culture. These social norms are vital for the stability and predictability of a society. People who follow these norms are well adjusted in group and those who don't follow the norms will be disapproved or even excluded from the group. As per the question, Thomas's decision to choose not to smoke in the class reveals his zeal to be accepted in class.
<span>Since humanism was conceived in the early 20th century rejected revealed knowledge, theism-based morality and the supernatural.</span>
