<h2><u><em>
Answer:
</em></u></h2><h2><u><em>
</em></u></h2>
ASA and AAS
<h2><u><em>
Step-by-step explanation:
</em></u></h2>
We do not know if these are right triangles; therefore we cannot use HL to prove congruence.
We do not have 2 or 3 sides marked congruent; therefore we cannot use SSS or SAS to prove congruence.
We are given that EF is parallel to HJ. This makes EJ a transversal. This also means that ∠HJG and ∠GEF are alternate interior angles and are therefore congruent. We also know that ∠EGF and ∠HGJ are vertical angles and are congruent. This gives us two angles and a non-included side, which is the AAS congruence theorem.
Since EF and HJ are parallel and EJ is a transversal, ∠JHG and ∠EFG are alternate interior angles and are congruent. Again we have that ∠EGF and ∠HGJ are vertical angles and are congruent; this gives us two angles and an included side, which is the ASA congruence theorem.
Not exactly. there are still 40 percent of the employees that are not top performers. for all you know those 40 percent could make up the majority of the employees in the training program<span />
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The description is too ambiguous to reconstruct the diagram. You need to post the actual diagram.
That diagram is just one way to view division by a fraction. An easier way: DIVIDING by a fraction is the same as MULTIPLYING by the upside-down fraction. For example,
(1/2) ÷ (1/4) = (1/2) × (4/1) = 2
That doesn’t help you answer this particular question, though.