,Okay, so here is how to calculate the amount of the trade discount:
I: $149,500 * .10 (10%) = 14,950 (this is the 10% discount)
149,500 - 14,950 = 134,550 (how much it costs with a 10% discount)
II: 134,550 * .5 (5%) = 6727.50
134,550 - 6727.50 = 127,822.50
III: 127,822.50 * .4 (4%) = 5112.90
The amount of the trade discount is: $14,950 + $6727.50 + $5112.90 = 26,790.40 dollars.
She should "Decide how to price her product". Which is response B.
This is because all the other options don't really make sense. You can't advertise something that you don't even know how much it costs. We've also already decided what the company sells. And we can't decide where the product will be sold unless we have made up the price for the product!
Hope this helps!
Answer:
626 and 654
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that a television sports commentator wants to estimate the proportion of citizens who "follow professional football."
Part I:
p = 0.48

Margin of error =
Sample size should be >626
Part II:
If unknown we take p = 0.5 because maximum std error for this
Here everything would be the same except insted of 0.48 we use 0.5
Margin of error = 
-------------------------
a and b are too close because 0.46 proportion is close to part b proporti0n 0.5
Scenarios B, D, and F require a police officer. In scenario B, 1:00-2:00pm, and scenario F, 5:00-6:00pm, there are 24 cars. In scenario D, 3:00-4:00pm, there are 21 cars. Both 24 and 21 are greater than 17, so a traffic officer is needed. However, in other scenarios, the number of cars are all less than 17, and no officer is needed.
Answer:
Option A will be the answer.
Step-by-step explanation:
The number of members, s(t), who joined the program t months after it was introduced is modeled by the function below
The function is an exponential function and y-intercept of the function is at (0,20) point.
Now, from the graph given in the options, the first graph matches the criteria.
Hence, option A will be the answer. (Answer)