Answer:
a. Do these preferences exhibit a diminishing marginal rate of substitution?
- no, because the consumer is actually purchasing a higher amount of goods, the only difference is that they are paying a lower price.
Assume that this consumer has $24 of income to spend on sugar, and the price of store-brand sugar is $1 per pound and the price of producer-brand sugar is $3 per pound.
- The consumer will purchase 24 pounds of price of store sugar simply because the price is much lower, not because he/she wants to consume less. Actually a lower price might result in an increase of consumption.
b. How much of each type of sugar will be purchased?
- If the consumer is willing to spend the whole $24 on sugar, he/she will purchase 24 pounds of store brand sugar. The alternative is to buy 8 pounds of producer brand sugar, and that is not a good deal.
c. How would your answer change if the price of store-brand sugar was $2 per pound and the price of producer-brand sugar was $3 per pound?
- The consumer would purchase 12 pounds of store brand sugar instead of 24, but he/she will still not purchase producer brand sugar since the difference in price is still too high. Remember that consumers view both types of sugar as perfect substitutes, so they will purchase the brand with the lower price.
Answer:
C. A change from expensing certain costs to capitalizing these costs due to a change in the period benefited, should be handled as a change in accounting estimate.
Explanation:
The statement above describes or the other hand talks about expenditure and capitalization.
Therefore, expenditure is explained as either capitalized as a cost of the asset on the company’s balance sheet or it is expensed in the income statement of the incurred period.
Under IFRS, the following rules govern the categorization of the expenditure as an asset:
If the expenditure is expected to give economic benefits in future over several accounting periods.
If one can measure the cost reliably. Also, increases the assets on the company’s balance sheet.
Recorded on the cash flow statement as a cash outflow for investing.
Answer:
A. $73,000
Explanation:
When a company is protected by a hedge it pays the forward exchange rate of the day it entered into the forward contract when payment date has come.
The Question is incomplete. Below are the missing parts and attached picture with spot rate and forward exchange rate.
Select one:
A. $73,000
B. $72,700
C. $73,200
D. $75,000
Answer: The statement "A. The units in beginning inventory plus the units transferred out during the month should equal the units in the ending inventory plus the units transferred in during the month." is <u>FALSE.</u>
Explanation: The units in beginning inventory plus the units<u> </u><u>transferred in</u> during the month <u>MUST be equal</u> the units in the ending inventory plus the units <u>transferred out during</u> the month.
Answer:
The answer is: $40,000
Explanation:
Chris's opportunity cost of working as a consultant instead of working as a business manager (her old job) is $40,000. So in order for Chris to earn normal profit, the difference between his revenue and his combined explicit (e.g. rent, assistant's salary) and implicit costs (opportunity cost) is zero.
