So going+return=1356
return is 284 lesss than going
return=-284+going
subsitute
going-284+going=1356
2going-284=1356
add 284 to both sides
2going=1640
divide both sides by 2
going=820
so we havve
return=-284+going
return=-284+820
return=536
answer is return=536 miles
Answer:
The sample consisting of 64 data values would give a greater precision.
Step-by-step explanation:
The width of a (1 - <em>α</em>)% confidence interval for population mean μ is:

So, from the formula of the width of the interval it is clear that the width is inversely proportion to the sample size (<em>n</em>).
That is, as the sample size increases the interval width would decrease and as the sample size decreases the interval width would increase.
Here it is provided that two different samples will be taken from the same population of test scores and a 95% confidence interval will be constructed for each sample to estimate the population mean.
The two sample sizes are:
<em>n</em>₁ = 25
<em>n</em>₂ = 64
The 95% confidence interval constructed using the sample of 64 values will have a smaller width than the the one constructed using the sample of 25 values.
Width for n = 25:
Width for n = 64:
![\text{Width}=2\cdot z_{\alpha/2}\cdot \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{64}}=\frac{1}{8}\cdot [2\cdot z_{\alpha/2}\cdot \sigma]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Ctext%7BWidth%7D%3D2%5Ccdot%20z_%7B%5Calpha%2F2%7D%5Ccdot%20%5Cfrac%7B%5Csigma%7D%7B%5Csqrt%7B64%7D%7D%3D%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B8%7D%5Ccdot%20%5B2%5Ccdot%20z_%7B%5Calpha%2F2%7D%5Ccdot%20%5Csigma%5D)
Thus, the sample consisting of 64 data values would give a greater precision
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
a)
Test statistic:




here test statistic lie in rejection region,that why null hypothesis fails
so Yes, its significant.
b)
Test statistic:




c)
sample variability increases, therefore likelihood of rejecting the null hypothesis decreases.
Answer:
If a desert became flooded, some species would immeadiately go extinct, distrupting the ecosystem, biodiversity, and the food web. This flood might cause new species to enter the ecosystem as well, through means such as rafting. Other species would be forced to adapt to the new environment, leading to adaptation and possibly speciation. For a time the ecosystem would not be very stable, but after a relatively short time, 10 or 20 years, the ecosystem could stabilize itself. So my conclusion is that ecosystems are relatively fluid, they can adapt to almost anything if they have enough time and the change in environment isn’t too drastic.
Step-by-step explanation:
1. 56.6 - 3.2 = 53.4
2. 53.4 divided by 2 = 26.7
3. 26.7 - 6 = 20.7
Answer: 20.7 mL