LaTasha was presented with the following data set and argued that there was no correlation between x and y. Is LaTasha correct?
Use the regression equation to explain your reasoning.
2 answers:
You might be interested in
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that two well-known aviation training schools are being compared using random samples of their graduates
Fly more academy 70 of 140
Blue Yonder 104 of 260
Combined pass = (70+104) out of (140+260)
a) Pooled proportion=
b) H0: p1 = p2
Ha: p1 ≠p2
(two tailed test)
p difference=
std error for difference (using pooled proportion) =
Test statistic = p difff/std error = 4.034
c) Critical value for 0.05 is 1.96
d) p value is < 0.005
Since p < 0.05 our significant level we reject H0
There is significant difference between the two proportions.
Answer:
D. StartFraction negative 1 + StartRoot 3 EndRoot Over 2 EndFraction
Step-by-step explanation:
Multiply numerator and denominator by the conjugate of the denominator. Then the denominator is the difference of squares, which will be rational. This simplification is called "rationalizing the denominator."