Answer:
a) About 12%
Step-by-step explanation:
We need to find the interest rate required to achieve her goal, so we will need to use the interest-compound formula:

Where:
PV= Present Value
i= interest rate
FV= Future Value
n= number of periods
replacing the data provided:

solving for i:
first, divide both sides by 50.000 to simplify the equation:

Take
roots of both sides:
±![\sqrt[10]{3}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Csqrt%5B10%5D%7B3%7D)
solve for i:
±![\sqrt[10]{3} -1](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Csqrt%5B10%5D%7B3%7D%20-1)
We get two answers, but we look for a coherent value. So we take the positive one:
≈12
Answer: 957.8
Step-by-step explanation:
1.25 /5
12/5 = 2 with 2 left over
25/5 = 5
2 numbers
1.25 /5 = .25
Each person gets .25 of a pizza
Answer:
There is enough evidence to support the claim that the true proportion of monitors with dead pixels is greater than 5%.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 300
p = 5% = 0.05
Alpha, α = 0.05
Number of dead pixels , x = 24
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
This is a one-tailed(right) test.
Formula:
Putting the values, we get,
Now, we calculate the p-value from excel.
P-value = 0.00856
Since the p-value is smaller than the significance level, we fail to accept the null hypothesis and reject it. We accept the alternate hypothesis.
Conclusion:
Thus, there is enough evidence to support the claim that the true proportion of monitors with dead pixels is greater than 5%.
Here are a few doubles facts:
5+5=10
2+2=4
3+3=6
A double is simply a pair of identical numbers added together. There's a pair of doubles you can <em>subtract </em>1 from to get 6+7, and there's a pair you can <em>add</em> 1 to get the same answer. What are those pairs?
Hint: If you take the example 3+4, you can either <em>subtract 1</em> from the double 4+4 or <em>add 1</em> to the double 3+3 to obtain your answer.