Answer:
a public library
Explanation:
I not sure I tried my best
Answer:
Andrew Carnegie was extremely wealthy having built a personal fortune from steel. He was a philanthropist and believed in giving back to the community but he still maintained control of where and how to donate. The kind of projects he prioritized did little to directly help the class of people who struggle daily like coal miners.
Explanation:
Andrew Carnegie was known as a philanthropist, he felt it was his duty or obligation to give back to the community as a wealthy person. But he was also the wealthiest man in the world in 1901 when he retired. There is a big disparity between his life and the life of average coal miner who had to struggle in the mines and risked their health and lives because the earnings were a bit higher than other options for the poorer or working class at the time, particularly where there was coal mining in the Appalachians and around Pittsburgh, for example. This philanthropic view was not ethical because it was the wealthy man himself who still decided where the money was to be donated or invested and in the kind of services it would provide. Carnegie donated to museums and libraries in the Pittsburgh area for example, and while valuable in themselves they do little to improve the quality of life for working class people directly, like coal miners. Although Carnegie did respond personally to some families in the Harwick Mine Disaster for example, having medals privately minted for the families of two miners who gave their lives trying to save the others. Carnegie also gave $5 million to establish a Carnegie Hero Fund (note how the gesture was branded in the sense even in giving it carries the Carnegie name). But 181 people died in that accident that was indicative of other sacrifices many countless other coal miners made to help amass his personal fortune.
I believe the answer is Two women who formed the National Woman Suffrage Association.
When a <u>drawback</u> is imposed, US manufacturers are allowed to access rebates on taxes on goods they import to the country, as well as when they export them again. This is considered as something beneficial for local manufacturers, as they are able to improve their competitiveness towards overseas competitors who probably have less labor or material costs. In the overall scenario, this represents an advantage of trade regulation as it fulfills the purpose of increasing trade.
When a government grants <u>benefits</u> to producers, in order to foment the development of certain sectors, this represents an overall disadvantage, as there could be a potential inefficient assignment of resources due to the fact that there could be other sectors that could end up being more profitable for the country if they were to be assigned resources.
Answer:
Government institutions
Pass laws that uphold
cultural values
Religious institutions
Shape ideas about work
and money in a culture
Explanation:
The government and religious institutions have a great power over the culture of a place. This is because they are often the ones that determine a place culture, although sometimes, cultures also emerge from the bottom-up, and reach government and religious institutions in this manner.
