Answer: This is how each person will be charged:
Principal = Harold
Accomplice=Marci
Accessory before the fact = Carl
Accessory after the fact=Shawn, David
Explanation:
Principal :
Is the person who commit the actual crime , Harold is the one who went inside and cracked the safe hence he is the one who commited the actual crime.
Accomplice:
This is the person who assists someone to commit a crime , Marci drove the van to the place where Harold will commit this crime so she provided him with the transport to go and commit burglary and she is the one who helped Harold get away .
Accessory before the fact:
This is a charge given to someone who encourages ,counsels and aids someone to commit a crime eventhough this person will not be physcally there at the scene. Carl is the one who told them where the vault is located which encouraged them more to commit this crimes because they were equipped with knowledge.
accessory after the fact
This is a charge given to someone who helps a person who has committed a crime eventhough they were also not there at the scene. Shawn is told by Harold that him and merci have commited burglary but he decided to help him get away instead of reporting the crime. David saw the crime being commited but still didn't say a thing to the police.
Answer:you can ask to offer him something else other than what he wants; suggest something else which may be even better than what he asks for. You may offer another service .
If this is not resolving the situation you can offer your apology constantly keeping a calm tone as you continue to let him know that you can not go against the company policy.
At all times no matter what you can not go to their standard of anger,you have to maintain a professional tone and show that you understand their concern even though you can not help them.
Explanation:
This outcome would be known as a <u>ceiling effect.</u>
In psychology, the ceiling effect is when a test establishes a range too low for measuring certain variable, that is to say, is when the upper limit (ceiling) of the test is too low, inadequate and not enough for the participants that the test is evaluating.
In this case, the participants are supposed to respond differently since some played violent video games for 5 minutes and other group played for 25 minutes. Since the outcome was that the majority were rated as "very aggressive", it's an indicator that they weren't tested adequately: the range was low, and therefore, it made it easier for some participants to get the score "very aggressive".
Answer:
B). Clyde had succeeded earlier in the same competition.
Explanation:
As per the question, option B i.e. 'Clyde had succeeded earlier in the same competition' seems to be the most accurate as it appropriately that Clyde must have had the earlier experience of succeeding in the same competition because after witnessing a failure an individual requires sufficient motivational strength to regain the vigor to perform with full strength and succeed. Thus, <u>Clyde must have gained this motivation and encouragement from her successful past experience to succeed in the competition which Sarah did not have and thus, she failed.</u> Therefore, <u>option B</u> is the correct answer.
Answer:
Demonstrate a continual problem with product piracy in China.
Explanation:
IN united states , selling of replicas from other brand is clearly protected under The Trademark Counterfeiting Act of 1984. Everyone who are caught counterfeiting in united states can be sentenced with up to 10 years of prison times and monetary fines depending on how big the operation is.
This law is not extended to all countries globally. China is the main perpetrator of U.S counterfeit products so far, they take up more than 81% of total United States' pirated product.
It's hard to punish the people who live in different governmental jurisdiction. The best thing that United States and the allies can do is by punishing China with trade policies. But this do very little to hurt China's economy since they can pursue economic relationships with other countries which are not a part of our Alliance.
