answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Over [174]
2 years ago
10

Suppose that a worker in Cornland can grow either 40 bushels of corn or 10 bushels of oats per year, and a worker in Oatland can

grow either 5 bushels of corn or 50 bushels of oats per year. There are 20 workers in Cornland and 20 workers in Oatland. If the two countries do not trade, Cornland will produce and consume 400 bushels of corn and 100 bushels of oats, while Oatland will produce and consume 60 bushels of corn and 400 bushels of oats. If each country made the decision to specialize in producing the good in which it has a comparative advantage, then the combined yearly output of the two countries would increase by
a. 280 bushels of corn and 450 bushels of oats.
b. 340 bushels of corn and 500 bushels of oats.
c. 360 bushels of corn and 520 bushels of oats.
d. 360 bushels of corn and 640 bushels of oats.
Business
1 answer:
mezya [45]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The answer is B) 340 bushels of corn and 500 bushels of oats.

Explanation:

Cornland´s workers have a comparative advantage in the production of corn, each worker can grow 40 bushels per year. Since Cornland has 20 workers in total, its maximum possible output of corn bushels would be 800 (20x40=800).

Oatland´s workers have a comparative advantage in the production or oats, each worker can grow 50 bushels per year. Since Oatland has 20 workers in total, its maximum possible output of oats bushels would be 1,000 (20x50=1,000).

Currently both countries combined are producing 460 bushels of corn (400+60=460) and 500 bushels of oats (100+400=500). If each country specializes in the production of the good in which they have a comparative advantage, then their total combined output would increase by  340 bushels of corn and 500 bushels of oats.

  • Corn: specialized production - current production = 800-460 = 340 bushels
  • Oats: specialized production - current production = 1,000-500 = 500 bushels
You might be interested in
Drew Cane Products, Inc., processes sugar cane in batches. The company buys a batch of sugar cane from farmers for $90 which is
KatRina [158]

Answer:

The financial advantages from further processing the batch into two end products is $44.

Explanation:

- The financial advantages from further process can fiber into industrial fiber is calculated as:

  + Price of industrial fiber - price of can fiber - cost of further process into industrial fiber = 45 - 21 - 13 = $11.

- The financial advantages from further process can juice into molasses is calculated as:

  + Price of molasses - price of molasses - cost of further process into molasses = 103 - 29 - 41 = $33.

The total financial advantages from further processing the batch into two end products is calculated as: The financial advantages from further process can fiber into industrial fiber + The financial advantages from further process can juice into molasses = 11 + 33 = $44.

7 0
2 years ago
You get a 15% discount if you buy a new range listing at $924.95 and a new freezer listing at $12,695.95 on the same bill. What
Lynna [10]

Answer:

$ 2,043.14

Explanation:

The shelf price for the two items are $924.95 and $12, 695.95

The total price for both will be

=924.95 + 12, 695.95

=$13, 620.9

A 15% discount on both equals to 15/100 x 13,620.9

=0.15  x 13,620.9

=2,043.135

=$ 2,043.14

5 0
2 years ago
Turner Corporation acquired two inventory items at a lump-sum cost of $100,000. The acquisition included 3,000 units of product
inessss [21]

Answer:

The amount of gross profit Turner Corporation should recognize is $20,000.

Explanation:

The following are given in the question:

Lump-sum cost = $100,000

Units of LF acquired = 3,000

Units of 1B acquired = 7,000

LF price per unit = $30

1B price per unit = $10

Unit of LF sold = 1,000

Therefore, we have:

Share of LF in the Lump-sum cost = (Units of LF acquired / (Units of LF acquired + Units of 1B acquired)) * Lump-sum cost = (3,000 / (3,000 + 7,000)) * $100,000 = $30,000

LF cost per unit = Share of LF in the Lump-sum cost / Units of LF acquired = $30,000 / 3,000 = $10

LF total revenue = Unit of LF sold * LF price per unit = 1,000 * $30 = $30,000

LF cost of goods sold = Unit of LF sold * LF cost per unit = 1,000 * $10 = $10,000

LF gross profit = LF total revenue - LF cost of goods sold = $30,000 - $10,000 = $20,000

Therefore, the amount of gross profit Turner Corporation should recognize is $20,000.

3 0
2 years ago
Assume that a six-firm cartel supplies 500 million units of Whatailsya energy drink at a price of $5.00 per unit. Each firm supp
bazaltina [42]

Answer:

<u>The net gain for the firm cheating the cartel is US$ 183 million (rounding the answer to the nearest million).</u>

Explanation:

1. Let's review all the information provided for solving this case:

Number of firms that supply  Whatailsya energy drink = 6

Amount of production of the cartel of six firms = 500 million units

Price of the energy drink = US$ 5

Amount of production of the firm that decided to break the cartel = 50 million extra units

Price after the extra production is sold = US$ 4.50

2. Let's find the individual production of each firm before and after the 50 million extra units and the net gains for the cheating firm.

Individual production of each firm of the cartel = Amount of production of the cartel/Number of firms

Individual production of each firm of the cartel = 500 million units/6

Individual production of each firm of the cartel = 83.33 million units

Individual sales of each firm before the 50 million extra units = Individual production * Price of the energy drink

Individual sales of each firm before the 50 million extra units = 83.333 million * 5

Individual sales revenue of each firm before the 50 million extra units = US$ 416.666 million

New production amount of the firm cheating the cartel = 83.333 + 50

New production amount of the firm cheating the cartel = 133.333 million units

Price of the energy drink after the extra production is sold = US$ 4.50

New sales revenue of the firm cheating the cartel = New production amount * Price of the energy drink after the extra production is sold

New sales revenue of the firm cheating the cartel = 133.333 million * 4.50

New sales revenue of the firm cheating the cartel = US$ 600 million

Net gain of the firm cheating the cartel = New sales revenue of the firm cheating the cartel - Individual sales of each firm before the 50 million extra units

Net gain of the firm cheating the cartel = 600 million - 416.666 million

Net gain of the firm cheating the cartel = 183.333 million

<u>Net gain of the firm cheating the cartel = US$ 183 million (rounding the answer to the nearest million)</u>

6 0
2 years ago
Southeastern Oklahoma State​ University's business program has the facilities and faculty to handle an enrollment of 2,200 new s
docker41 [41]

Answer:

a. 0.7273 or 72.73%

b. 0.8875 or 88.75%

Explanation:

a. Utilization rate is the ratio of the amount of installed capacity planned to be used relative to the total installed capacity. This can be stated as follows:

Utilization rate = ICP ÷ TC ......................................... (1)

ICP = Amount of installed capacity planned to be used

TC = Total installed capacity

From the question, ICP = 1,600 while TC = 2,200. Substituting this into equation (1), we have:

Utilization rate = 1,600 ÷ 2,200 = 0.7273 or 72.73%  

Therefore, utilization rate is 0.7273 or 72.73%.

b. Efficiency rate is the ratio of the actual installed capacity used relative to the amount of installed capacity planned to be used. This can be stated as follows:

Efficiency rate = AIC ÷ ICP ......................................... (1)

AIC = Actual installed capacity used

ICP = Amount of installed capacity planned to be used

From the question, ICP = 1,420 while TC = 1,600. Substituting this into equation (1), we have:

Efficiency rate = 1,420 ÷ 1,600 = 0.8875 or 88.75%

Therefore, efficiency rate is 0.8875 or 88.75% .

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Joseph purchased 100 shares of abcd growth fund for $10.00 per share for a total investment of $1,000. at the end of one year, h
    8·1 answer
  • A company manufacturing shirts for a department store decides to create a new style of cotton shirt. The company would most like
    11·2 answers
  • Intertech corporation recorded pretax restructuring charges of $1033.5 million in 2017. The charges consisted of asset write-dow
    14·1 answer
  • Match the scenarios to the type of income earned based on the categories of the income approach.
    11·1 answer
  • Jerome, Inc., paid $8,850 to make a debt investment in trading securities of Tedesco, Inc. On December 30, (within the same fisc
    15·1 answer
  • Accounts receivable from sales to customers amounted to $40,000 and $32,000 at the beginning and end of the year, respectively.
    13·1 answer
  • Marketability is the ability of an investor A)to sell a security quickly, at a low transaction cost, and at a price close to its
    6·1 answer
  • Tunstall, Inc., a small service company, keeps its records without the help of an accountant. After much effort, an outside acco
    14·1 answer
  • 6) Discuss the following statement: "Good research is deductive in nature."
    14·1 answer
  • Your company is considering a project that will cost $100. The project will generate after-tax cash flows of $37.50 per year for
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!