I believe the answer is: <span>punishment is known only to temporarily suppress or inhibit a behavior
In order to fully change another individuals' behavior, the most effective method is to make the people understand the principle on why they should change it.
For example, for children who like to throw their vegetables, the best method to encourage them to eat it by making them understand how eating the vegetables would make them closer to a figure that they admire (such as super heroes, or cartoon animals)</span>
Hello. You forgot to enter the answer options. The options are:
A. Use a variety of communication formats
B. Allow more time than usual for group development and discussions
C. If possible, achieve an even distribution of people from various cultures,
D.Agree on clear guidelines for discussions, participation, and decision-making.
Answer:
A. Use a variety of communication formats
Explanation:
By using a variety of communication formats, an institution is able to make its members more comfortable to communicate when necessary, especially when that institution has members from different cultures, who can reinforce communication through a specific way. In addition to the cultural weight, each individual can be comfortable with only one form of communication, thus facilitating the exposure of ideas and the progress of the institution.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
In this question, what is asked is to compare the plagiarism of the student version compared to this original version form the author.
The original version is the one that appears in this question. The version of the student is the following:
"Teachers don't often provide feedback anonymously, but the ability to provide feedback anonymously may create a context where the rationale associated with specific suggestions can be more safely explored (Howard, Barrett, & Frick, 2010). However, we cannot assume that all anonymous online spaces will serve as safe social spaces."
We have three options in this question: A) word-for-word plagiarism. B) paraphrasing plagiarism. C) this is no plagiarism. So, by the way, the student's answer was written, we can assume that there is no plagiarism.
Answer:
Jefferson faces the following potential ethical dilemmas:
- By taking his clients to his property he could have been perceived as trying to influence them by buying their approval with gifts and luxuries. On the other hand, by taking them to the club he can be perceived as generous and friendly, as he is inviting them to have a good time.
- By discussing politics with the clients, he risks them associating Jefferson’s company with a specific ideology. This could harm the reputation of the company and its products, as well as alienating potential clients who do not share that view. However, by talking about politics he can be relatable to clients' view of the world.
- Since this was an informal discussion, he risked providing the clients with inaccurate information about the products, as probably he did not have accurate data at hand to back up his claims. Nevertheless, informal conversations are a good way of building rapport with clients, while providing information that suits their needs in a friendly manner.
- By meeting the clients separately in the parking lot and customizing the prices, he risks being overheard by others, who can perceive customization as a corrupt practice. He risks the clients find out that others were offered better prices. On the other hand, the clients might feel that he had a special consideration with each of them.
Explanation:
An ethical dilemma happens when there are two distinct ways to make a decision, neither is more acceptable than the other, but by choosing one the other is transgressed. This mental experiment poses questions about how to act morally, by making the best possible decision.
Answer:
Explanation:
psychoanalytic theory, the ego's protective methods of reducing anxiety by .... the "third force" in psychology because it rejects the notion that childhood ... or other forces in the environment (behaviorism) dictate a person's personality.