First would be A Second would be c\
Answer:
The very definitions of ‘individualism’ and ‘collectivism’ are, by themselves, ideological definitions.
Reality shows us that these two ‘ideologies’ are pragmatically practiced, with one or the other being the policy-making ideology. We have already seen the results of
collectivism, as gruesomely displayed during the 75 year life of the ‘late’ Soviet Union, and the CONTINUING forms of that totalitarian collectivism in the People’s Republic of China and North Korea.
Tiananmen Square in China was the classic confrontation conflict
of the individual dissidents against the tyrannical Chinese State.
The United States, Australia, and some of the European states tend to exhibit MORE individualism by virtue of their democratic forms of government. There is NO ‘ pure individualism’ anywhere on Earth, as all national populations have their civic codes and regulations governing individual behavior.
Philosophically AND practically speaking, it is ALWAYS the individual that will be oppressed by the governing state[collectivism] - I know of NO instance -ever -where any individual person oppressed an established government.
Find the attachment for the answer.
Note: I have added the complete question in the attachment.
<span>The sac like fruting structures are present in the fungi belonging to the division Ascomycota. The fruting bodeis are called as ascocarp, and the spores are called as ascospores, which are non-motile.</span>
The technique that uses an enzyme to replicate DNA regions from a small sample of DNA is called <span>PCR (polymerase chain reaction) analysis</span>. The answer to your question is B. I hope this is the answer that you are looking for and it comes to your help.
