The answer to this question is: A.<span>unconstitutional under the supremacy clause.
Under supremacy clause, whenever the state law and the federal law are contradicting each other, the court must follow the law that written within the federal law and rules the lesser law as unconstitutional
This clause is created to make sure that all laws in each state are up to a certain standard.</span>
Answer:
The answer is A
Explanation:
Pilar is stating the obvious when she makes the remark since we presume two things: In first place, if she were not commenting on his/her work she would have made that remark at the beginning, which makes this statement redundant. In second place, if she were giving suggestions about how to improve the person's work, she might be trying to be polite to the client.
Pilar should have avoided saying the phrase because she either being redundant, the first scenario, or saying something inaccurate in order to b polite, as in the second scenario. As a general rule, stating something implicitly negative and even vague at the end of a comment usually confuses the recipient of the message, who has to imagine the possible meaning of that statement.
Answer and Explanation:
What Robert Putnam meant to say by the statement was that the number of active meaningful societies, and the extent to which they are socially active, would go a long way in determining the health and well-being of the citizens: the number and level of activity of Italy’s choral societies (choir groups) have had a great impact on the wellbeing of many Italians—similar to getting health bills reimbursed, or using high-level social activities to enhance well-being.
The humanistic perspective is often referred to as the "third force" in psychology and focuses on a person's freedom of choice in determining their behavior. The humanistic perspective states that each person is unique and individual and that an individual's behavior is connected to his inner feelings and self-image. According this perspective we are each responsible for our own happiness and well-being.
Answer:
extreme dieters
Explanation:
Extreme dieting involves individuals that become overly conscious about what they eat and think they know about what they should and should not eat but are not really well informed on this topic. This is different from anoxeria which is a loss in appetite resulting from a disorder that makes one desire and obsess over losing weight by not eating. Extreme dieting individuals may believe every kid of food might make them fat
