First calculate the amount financed
Amount financed=725−50=675
The formula is
I=(2yc)/(m (n+1))
Solve for c to get
C=(I×m×(n+1))/2y
C=(0.14×675×(24+1))÷(2×12)=98.44
Total of payments=675+98.44=773.44
Monthly payment is
773.44÷24=32.23
Hope it helps!
The answer is 5,000bdbrbgvtvdhdudidjrbrbfbtbfjf
Complete question:
The marginal utility of the last unit of apples consumed is 12 and the marginal utility of the last unit of bananas consumed is 8. What set of prices for apples and bananas, respectively, would be consistent with consumer equilibrium
a. $8 and $12
b. $6 and $4
c. $16 and $9
d. $4 and $6
Answer:
$6 and $4 set of prices for apples and bananas, respectively, would be consistent with consumer equilibrium.
Explanation:
Given,
The marginal utility of the last unit of apples consumed = 12
The marginal utility of the last unit of bananas consumed = 8
Now ,
To find :
The market level for apples and bananas, respectively, will be compatible with the consumer's equilibrium:
=
= $6
=
= $4
$6 and $4 set of prices for apples and bananas, respectively, would be consistent with consumer equilibrium.
Answer:
50 billion
Explanation:
Investment declines by $130 billion for every 1 percentage point increase in the real interest rate.
Decline in Investment because of higher real interest rate:
= 2 × 100
= $200 billion
Increase in Investment because of higher expected rate of return:
= 1 × 150
= 150 billion
Total decline in investment:
= -200 + 150
= 50 billion
Therefore, 50 billion of investment will be crowding out.
Answer:
a. $140,000 decrease
Explanation:
![\left[\begin{array}{cccc}Year&continued&discontinued&differential\\Sales&680,000&0&-680,000\\variable \: cost&-540,000&0&540,000\\contibution&140,000&0&-140,000\\fixed \: cost&-145,000&-145,000&0\\net \: income&-5,000&-145,000&-140,000\\\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bcccc%7DYear%26continued%26discontinued%26differential%5C%5CSales%26680%2C000%260%26-680%2C000%5C%5Cvariable%20%5C%3A%20cost%26-540%2C000%260%26540%2C000%5C%5Ccontibution%26140%2C000%260%26-140%2C000%5C%5Cfixed%20%5C%3A%20cost%26-145%2C000%26-145%2C000%260%5C%5Cnet%20%5C%3A%20income%26-5%2C000%26-145%2C000%26-140%2C000%5C%5C%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
The fixed cost would not be eliminated entirely and we have no information of any partial decrease. so the differential analysis shows a decrease in 140,000 in the net income if product T is discountinued