Answer:Primary appraisal
Explanation: when something happen we appraise it measuring it against some criteria,then we are able to experience an emotion based on our appraisal.
Primary appraisal occurs when we assess how critical a situation is in terms of what threat is poses to us or if it grant us an opportunity
Secondary appraisal occurs when we look at strategies available to use to adjust in that situation or maximize the moment.
Answer:
Over-the-Counter market.
Explanation:
The Over-the-Counter market is a place where securities not listed on the Nasdaq, NYSE, AMEX or other exchanges are traded. The OTC market is a good option for those companies like Iron Age Metalworks which may want to avoid paperwork or do not meet the listing requirements imposed by the national exchanges. It is also important to mention that the securities traded on the OTC market are usually considered to be riskier than those traded on the national stock exchanges.
Answer: This is not plagiarism
Which of the following is true for the Student Version?
Word-for-Word plagiarism
Paraphrasing plagiarism
This is not plagiarism
Explanation:
Plagiarism is the use of a published work without attributing credit to the author. Word-for-word plagiarism is when a body of text is copied from the original work and made to seem like one's work.
Paraphrasing Plagiarism rewrites the text by substituting words with their synonyms but it still has the same information as the original text.
In this question, the student's version is different from the original text. The student argues for the efficiency of rapid prototyping while the original text explains why it is a possible design methodology for instructional design. What they both have in common is that they mention how successful rapid prototyping has been in software design.
Not me, sorry :( what is it ?
Answer:
The correct answer is d) stare decisis
.
Explanation:
The doctrine of stare decisis is mostly used by Europeans; It has the function of establishing a precedent for future decisions in a sentence since it creates an antecedent with the determination made by the court on the verdict.
Future cases should take into account the opinion of the previous examples.
For many, this is a way to create impartiality in future cases, and they disagree that this doctrine will continue to apply.
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
