X times S = $27. X is the cost of the large sacks and S is the amount of sacks. Once they are multiplied it should equal $27. If this is incorrect please let me know so I can try and correct mistakes made.
It depends really. If you stay close to the present, then predicting future results isn't too bad. The further you go out, the more unpredictable things get. This is because the points may deviate from the line of best fit (aka regression line) as time wears on. Of course, it also depends on what kind of data we're working with. Some pairs of variables are naturally going to correlate very strongly together. An example would be temperature versus ice cream sales.
<h2>=============================</h2><h3>HOPE IT HELPS YOU SEE THE ATTACHMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION !!!</h3>
<h2>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++</h2>
<h2>REGARDS.... ✌✌✌</h2>
Answer: 0.813
Step-by-step explanation:
Let A be the event describes the number of residents believed that the amount of violent television programming had increased over the past 10 years.
& B be the event describes the number of residents believed that the amount of violent television programming had decreased over the past 10 years.
Given : n(A)=721 ; n(B)=454 ; n(A∩B)=362
We know that ,

i.e. 
Also, the total number of U.S. residents surveyed n(S)= 1,000
Then, the proportion of the 1,000 U.S. residents believed that either the amount of violent programming had increased or the overall quality of programming had decreased over the past 10 years will be :-

Hence, the required answer = 0.813
Answer:
0.02 inches per minute
Step-by-step explanation:
1 Week = 10080 minutes
Formaul: multiply the time value by 10080 to find the minutes in a week or do it the long way 60x24x7 = 10080
230/10080 = 0.02281746031 or 0.02 rounded to nearest hundert.