The first sampling method is Convenient Sampling. It is biased sampling and it is not representative of a random sample.
The second sampling method is Systematic Sampling. If this method of sampling is drawn from the population, it is an efficiently randomized sampling method.
Let us review the given answers.
1. Both samples should be exactly the same.
INCORRECT
2. Neither sample will be representative.
Because the second sampling method can be random, this answer is
INCORRECT.
3. The first sampling method, ..., is the most representative,
INCORRECT
4. The second sampling method, ..., is the most representative.
CORRECT
Answer: A)
Step-by-step explanation:
<em>aint no body got time for dat!!</em>
Hope this helps!
Answer: The exponents in the prime factorization are 2, 1, and 1. Adding one to each and multiplying we get (2 + 1)(1 + 1)(1 + 1) = 3 x 2 x 2 = 12. Therefore 315 has exactly 12 factors.
Step-by-step explanation: First, the exponents in the prime factorization are 2, 1, and 1. Then adding one to each and multiplying we get (2 + 1)(1 + 1)(1 + 1) = 3 x 2 x 2 = 12. Finally, 315 has exactly 12 factors.
Answer:
The solution in interval notation is:
.
The solution in inequality notation is:
.
Step-by-step explanation:
I think you are asking how to solve this for
.
Keep in mind
.


If
then
.

Subtract
on both sides:

Factor the difference of squares
:

Simplify inside the factors:


The left hand side is a parabola that faces up. I know this because the degree is 2.
The zeros of the the parabola are at x=-6 and x=2/5.
We can solve x+6=0 and 5x-2=0 to reach that conclusion.
x+6=0
Subtract 6 on both sides:
x=-6
5x-2=0
Add 2 on both sides:
5x=2
Divide both sides by 5:
x=2/5
Since the parabola faces us and
then we are looking at the interval from x=-6 to x=2/5 as our solution. That part is where the parabola is below the x-axis. We are looking for where it is below since it says the where is the parabola<0.
The solution in interval notation is:
.
The solution in inequality notation is:
.