Answer:
Longhorn Goodwill=$7920
Longhorn should record goodwill on this purchase of $7920.
Explanation:
Longhorn Goodwill=Price Paid to Acquire - Total fair Assets
Total Fair Assets=Fair Value of Assets-Fair Value if Liabilities
Total Fair Assets= $89,900-$15,200
Total Fair Assets= $74,700
Longhorn Goodwill=Price Paid to Acquire - Total fair Assets
Longhorn Goodwill=$82,620-$74,700
Longhorn Goodwill=$7920
Longhorn should record goodwill on this purchase of $7920.
Answer:
The answer is: the equilibrium quantity is larger than the socially optimal quantity.
Explanation:
In order for the equilibrium quantity and the socially optimal quantity to be equal, the government subsidy should have been equal to the positive externality created by the flu shots ($8). Since the government subsidy is larger, $11, then the equilibrium quantity will be higher (more flu shots supplied because of high subsidy).
Answer:
Yes, the firm Commodities Exchange Corporation is liable to E-products Inc. as it has entered into a contract with Brenda who had written authority to buy on behalf of the firm.
Explanation:
Indeed, the risk of Commodities stretches out to E-Products. This is mostly a direct result of the risk of the chief is towards the operator for the agreement the specialist is the gathering in the interest of the head. Aside from this, there is an express power having a place with Brenda as she was given the approval from the head. Because of express, an evident position E-Products got the affirmation that Commodities is being spoken to by Brenda.
There is no close to home risk of Brenda to pay for the different fringe gadgets to the E-Products. Because of evident position, it was a reality clear to E-Products that Brenda is just going about as an operator for Commodities. As these items were purchased for the utilization of the head as opposed to the individual utilization of Brenda in this way she doesn't have any obligation.
Answer:
The torts Mark might have committed by his action includes:
- assault and battery
- intentional infliction of emotional distress
- defamation of character
Explanation:
Assault and battery : grabbing of the 25 year old employ by the hand is considered forceful and wrong handling of a person and therefore is considering assault
Intentional infliction of emotional distress: keeping her in his office without actually seeking for her consent and also with her not aware of his next line of action can cause her emotional distress
defamation of character : screaming at her in front of other employees without evidence of stealing is considered defamation of the employees character
Customer wait times: A manager may use these analytics to determine points of friction with operations, implement systems to reduce time, develop employee expectations, and ultimately enhance right-on-time service to their customers.
