The Nixon case is a perfect demonstration of separation of powers which is a key tenet in democracy. Although Nixon argued that he enjoyed executive privilege and that the judiciary lacked power to compel him in the exercise of his discretion, the court upheld a decision compelling him to disclose material for evidence. Also, his conduct was investigated by Congress. This shows the separation of powers between the Judiciary, Executive and the Legislature.<span>
</span>
Such perils like hail, windstorms, fire, lightning, and vandalism are covered by the homeowners’ insurance policy but there are also essential components are excluded just like earthquakes and flood because both are coming without warning and can cause too much damage.
Answer:
B)
Explanation:
Negro exodus or Exoduster Movement represents the first migration of African Americans and people gave them the name Exodusters.
They migrated from Mississippi River to Kansas. This event was in 1879. and the factors for migration were discrimination, racism and also lack of opportunities. About forty thousand Exodusters left.
Answer:
The correct answer is: Visual Cortex.
Explanation:
The visual cortex is a part of the cerebral cortex that processes visual information.
The visual cortex is find in the back of the brain in the occipital lobe.
Both hemispheres of the brain contain a part of the visual cortex. If a person suffers trauma on the visual cortex, or suffer from a CVA that compromises the visual cortex, he/she will suffer impairments in the way the process visual information.
In this particular case, Scott lost his vision at a young age. He received a corneal transplant that allowed him to see again. After so many years of not being able to see, he had a very difficult time interpreting visual information such as faces and expressions. His visual problems most likely came from processing difficulties in the Visual cortex.
The answer is Explanation.
The social scientists were asked an explanatory situation in which they are required for reasons and evidence. In this case, these social scientists will use their critical thinking skill specifically explanation.
Explaining their reasons, opinions, and evidence will give the audience the satisfactory they were looking for. Actually, explanation of things will more likely work out in their case if they were asked about their research.
