Answer: The graph shows that people procrastinate by doing their taxes mostly in April then in the beginning of the year in January
Explanation: procrastination is basically like holding off for a certain amount of time hence the name of the article
<em>Answer:</em>
<em>discriminative stimulus </em>
<em>Explanation:</em>
<em>In psychology,</em><em> the discriminative stimulus is determined as one of the precursor stimuli that is supposed to have a stimulus control over a specific behavior due to the fact that the behavior was formerly reinforced in the presence of that particular stimulus in the past. In other words, it tends to set the event for specific behaviors that have already been reinforced in its presence in the "past".</em>
<em>As per the question, the mentioned statement represents the discriminative stimulus.</em>
Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
"Dr. Parrett is a sports psychologist for a large Southern university. The provost and chancellor have asked him to examine the relationship between athletic performance and academic stress at the university. For example, is it the case that the most talented athletes experience the greatest concern over their grades? The provost and chancellor have made it clear to Dr. Parrett that they want a large amount of external validity in the study. He has valid and reliable measures of both athletic performance and academic stress. He knows that he does not have the time or the money to study the entire population of interest.
Imagine that Dr. Parrett wants to use a nonrepresentative sampling technique. Name the three types of nonprobability sampling and explain how each one could be used by Dr. Parrett."
Answer:
The four types of nonprobability sampling are convenience sampling, purposive sampling, quota sampling, and snowball sampling.
Explanation:
Convenience sampling: Allows a selection to be made of a small sample of the target population of the research. This sample is made up of individuals who are available and accessible to research and not through statistical criteria. Regarding the question above, Dr. Parrett can select the athletes he knows and who would like to participate in the research.
Purposive sampling: It allows the sample to be controlled whenever a certain manipulation is possible to generate expected and known results. In the case of the question above, Dr Parrett can search for specific athletes, with characteristics that will generate an expected result in the research.
Snowball sampling: Allows the individuals who make up the sample to invite other individuals to compose the sample, who in turn can invite other individuals. In the case of the question above, Dr. Parret can invite the athletes he wants and ask them to call friends to participate in the survey as well.
Sampling quota: Allows the individuals who will compose the sample to be selected due to their characteristics and qualities. Regarding the question above, Dr. Parrett could only summon athletes with high marks.
Answer:
The Correct Option is D
Explanation:
One of the peculiarities of a grant deed is that even though it does not state or set forth in the deed the two warranties, they still very present. It does not have to be stated in the deed because as long as the deed has been transferred to Cameron, it is already implied that S.C Heet has not transferred to grant deed to anyone. Secondly, a deed must contain all encumbrances and issues that must be known by the grantor. Hence, even though these warranties were not stated in the grant deed because they are implied warranties and do not need to there for it to be present.
Answer:
The hypothesis that will best demonstrate an economic benefit to the ranchers will be "Pastures with the highest diversity of plant species will have the highest net primary productivity."
Explanation:
This hypotheses would best demonstrate an economic benefit because it clearly states that when plant species are diverse, this will provide the highest net productivity to the ranchers. Hence if the aim of the student is to determine if increasing species diversity of edible plant would lead to great economic benefits, then this suits for the hypotheses.