The correct answer is personalization.
This is a type of fallacy where you involve somebody's personality into an argument, even though it is completely unnecessary or wrong to do that. For example, if you are going to a dinner party and you are late, and the dinner is overcooked (completely unrelated to you being late), you might start thinking that it happened because of your tardiness, whereas that is obviously not the case.
Answer:
D). Both sentences are uplifting, but the second sentence has a more moral tone.
Explanation:
Tone is demonstrated as the author's approach or attitude towards a specific subject matter which is reflected through the choice of words or language employed by him/her. It primarily intends to provide the readers with a point-of-view to read a particular work.
As per the question, option D most appropriately states the comparison of tones employed in these sentences. It correctly states that however <u>'both the sentences are uplifting(as reflected by the use of phrase like 'along the roads, laurel, alder, etc. in the first while 'delighted' etc. in the second) but the second sentence conveys a more moral and noble tone as it provides the virtuous message of 'joy spread by great ferns and wildflowers to the traveler throughout the year</u>'. Therefore, <u>option D</u> is the correct answer.
In the United States Supreme Court, most of the cases are accepted by a writ of certiorari. These are filed by attorneys. The correct answer is B.
Answer: This is not plagiarism
Which of the following is true for the Student Version?
Word-for-Word plagiarism
Paraphrasing plagiarism
This is not plagiarism
Explanation:
Plagiarism is the use of a published work without attributing credit to the author. Word-for-word plagiarism is when a body of text is copied from the original work and made to seem like one's work.
Paraphrasing Plagiarism rewrites the text by substituting words with their synonyms but it still has the same information as the original text.
In this question, the student's version is different from the original text. The student argues for the efficiency of rapid prototyping while the original text explains why it is a possible design methodology for instructional design. What they both have in common is that they mention how successful rapid prototyping has been in software design.
Answer:
Interior personality trait when she doesnot know how to handle a situation.
Explanation:
