International Trade.
When a company sells its product over the US border into another country they are participating in International Trade.
Answer:
Annual inventory cost = $ 800.
Explanation:
Demand, D = 4000
Order cost, S = $ 20
Holding cost, H = $ 4
EOQ = sqrt(2 * D * S / H)
= sqrt(2 * 4000 * 20 / 4)
EOQ = 200
Annual inventory cost = Annual setup cost + Annual holding cost
= (D/Q * S) + (Q/2 * H)
= (4000 / 200 * 20) + (200 / 2 * 4) = 400 + 400 = $ 800
Annual inventory cost = $ 800.
Hey there
the answer is political-legal
thank you
best regards
OFFICIALLYSAVAGE2003
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": to appeal to both high and low involvement consumers.
Explanation:
Strong arguments are those that provide probable support for an idea. Weak arguments fail to provide support for different matters. Then, when talking about marketing, strong arguments are more likely to engage consumers with a product while weak arguments can attract consumers at low levels but the ideas lack reliability.
Thus,<em> infomercials can make use of both strong and weak arguments at different levels of consumer involvement.</em>
Answer with Explanation:
<u>Risk which can’t be mitigated</u>: The risks that the share price would fall due to sudden political environment instability or events that effects the economy will definitely affect the business operations as well. Thus are the risks that can not be mitigated at all. Another example would be Corona virus implications on the operation of the company which is again a risk that can't be mitigated.
<u>Risks, that aren’t worth the effort to reduce the exposure any further: </u>
The part of the sentence talks about the risk exposure which says that if the company doesn't resides in an area which is not prone to seismic activity and the chances of earthquake in a country is below 0.000001% which is almost negligible but still it is worthless to purchase the earthquake insurance. As this risk is almost negligible hence it is not worth the effort to reduce the exposure any further.
<u>Risks that wouldn't be addressed in short term due to other priorities: </u>
The risks that will not occur in the next 12 month, can be addressed after 6 months and thus allowing the company to prioritize the risks that must be resolved first. This means that if their is a risk that one of our several products that would be launched after 12 months from now will not be winning customer market can be addressed after 6 months because it is dependent on our future action. If we don't launch our product, our product is not rejected by the customer. Hence situations like this allows us to prioritize our risks.
