American founding fathers were concerned with the limits of democracy. Their concerns are similar to those of political philosophers such as John Stuart Mill (<em>On Liberty</em>) and Alexis de Tocqueville (<em>Democracy in America</em>). In particular, they were concerned that an excess of democracy would lead to a “tyranny of the majority.”
The tyranny of the majority refers to a situation in democratic rule where a self-interested majority can put their interests above those of the minority. It is an inherent weakness of majority rule and can lead to the oppression of minorities.
Alexander Hamilton wrote to Thomas Jefferson about this worry after The Constitutional Convention in 1787, and the constitution that was drafted reflects these concerns. The Electoral College is partly a safety mechanism to prevent the democratic victory of a tyrannical despot. Other mechanisms introduced were the Bill of Rights and the division of power, which prevents the centralization of all power in one individual, even a democratically elected one.
Answer: It is necessary to take responsibility for the individual or the authority for certain actions.
Explanation:
Otherwise, anarchy ensues. The government is the main implementer of these measures. Still, there is also a moral obligation of the individual to take responsibility. In this way, there is better promotion of the basic postulates of democracy, human rights, and freedoms. Each individual must assume this obligation because this type of responsibility establishes civilizational and democratic values.
Answer:
Cocktail Party Effect
Explanation:
Cocktail party effect: In psychology, the term cocktail party effect is defined as a phenomenon in which the brain's capability of an individual to focus on his or her auditory attention is being determined related to a specific stimulus and hence involves the process of filtering out various other stimuli.
Example: An individual who is in a part can easily lead a conversation by his or her friend because of the cocktail party effect.
In the question above, the given scenario best illustrates the cocktail party effect.
Answer:
immediate cost, future benefit, salary, net benefit
Explanation:
The question "What will I have to give up?" relates to <u>immediate cost</u>.
The question "What will I gain in return?" relates to <u>future benefits</u>.
The amount of money a worker might make on a job in a year is a <u>salary</u>.
The potential earnings of becoming a doctor minus the cost of going to medical school is the <u>net benefit</u>.
Immediate cost is the money spent on doing something or acquire an asset while future benefits is the potential for a venture, an activity or asset to contribute to financial gains in the future.
Salary is a fixed regular payment, mostly paid on a monthly basis but often expressed as an annual sum, made by an employer to an employee.
Net benefit is the summation of all the benefit accrued from a venture minus all expenses, it means the present value of the Covered Payments net of all expenses.
Answer: Negotiate a higher travel fee for the next assignment in that area.
Explanation: A notary signing agent refers to a notary, an independent contractor hired in other to obtain the formal signature and ensure loan documents are executed by the borrower and then returned for processing. This process is a critical part in completing real estate loan deals. As loans won't get funded without notary signing.
However, if a notary signing agent realizes that an already embarked location his outside his territory and the need for a higher fee, then, the higher negotiation fee will be for the next assignment in that territory or area.
