Answer:
differentiated by quality/design
Explanation:
In this scenario the two coffee shops have different strategies for sale. While Jackie's coffee is a sit down cafe with a waiter service that takes personalised orders, Johnny's coffee sells at various kiosks it owns.
These two businesses are differentiated by quality or design. Jackie's has more quality because of the personalised service provided to customers.
Jackie uses design of a sit down cafe in one location, while Johnny's business design is to sell coffee at various locations (kiosks)
Answer:
Actual Cost of Supplier A: $291.60
Actual Cost of Supplier B: $271.60
Explanation:
<u>Supplier A:</u>
Cost - 270
Shipping FOB shipping point
Purchase Discount = Invoice Price * Discount
For Supplier A, the invoice price is 270 and discount is 2/10 = 2%, so:
Purchase Discount = 270 * 0.02 = $5.4
Cost is:
270 + 27(shipping FOB point) - 5.4 = $291.60
<u>Supplier B:</u>
Cost - 280
Shipping Destination (so 0)
Purchase Discount = Invoice Price * Discount
For Supplier B, the invoice price is 280 and discount is 3%, so:
Purchase Discount = 280 * 0.03 = $8.4
Cost is:
280 - 8.4 = $271.60
Answer:
Option C is correct one.
<u>The investment strategy is conservative.
</u>
Explanation:
This is so because most of the money is either in cash or certificates of deposits. Portfolio also consists 40% of bonds with 6% interest rate and 40% equities are also only of the employer's stock. The rate of appreciation and dividend is also very low on this stock. Hence due to all these factors we can say the strategy is conservative.
Answer:
(D) Abby, Ben, and Clara
Explanation:
Given that each of the five citizens will share the cost of the public good equally (that is, $200 each), citizens who derive benefits greater than $200 are likely to vote in favor of an equal share of the cost since this option will result in a net benefit of the public good to them.
For instance, net benefit to Abby = $220 benefit - $200 cost = $20 net benefit.
On the other hand, citizens who derive benefits worth less than $200 are less likely to vote in favor of an equal share since an equal share will result in a net loss to them.
For instance, net loss to Matt = $120 benefit - $200 cost = $80 net loss.
Therefore, Abby ($220), Ben ($210) and Clara ($210) are likely to vote in favor of a proposal for an equal share of the cost, since the benefit they derive is greater than the cost in an equal share $200.
Answer:
Consumer EVA 7, 133.00
Commercial EVA 7,090.50
<u>Both are profitable</u>
<u />
Explanation:
The EVA (economic value added) is the result from subtracting the cost of capital of the investment to their divisional income. This will determinate if the division increase the company's capital or destroyed (as it return less than optimal/desired)
Consumer Income 11,500
Investment: 35,500 + 4,200 = 39,700
EVA: 11,500 - 39,700 x 11% = 7, 133
Commercial Income 11,925
Investment: 39,750 + 4,200 = 43,950
EVA: 11,925 - 43,950 x 11% = 7090.5
Both division are profitable as they generate more income than the cost of the investment
