Answer:
The correct answer is option d.
Explanation:
Unfavorable weather in Florida has adversely affected the production of Florida oranges. The decline in production has led to reduced supply of Florida oranges. This decrease in supply will lead to an increase in the price.
As Florida oranges and California oranges are substitutes, with the increase in the price of Florida oranges will lead to an increase in the demand for California oranges as people will prefer the cheaper substitute.
Answer:
8.28%
Explanation:
We use the Rate formula shown in the spreadsheet for this question
The NPER specifies the time period.
Given that,
Present value = $932
Future value or Face value = $1,000
PMT = 1,000 × 6.25% ÷ 2 = $31.25
NPER = 4 years × 2 = 8 years
The formula is shown below:
= Rate(NPER;PMT;-PV;FV;type)
The present value come in negative
So, after solving this,
the yield to maturity is 8.28%
Well it raises the price of goods such as a juice bottle costing 3.00 dollars and adding a 4% increase to that price. also another aim is better jobs for people, making sure that everyone can find a job
Answer:
$420,000
Explanation:
Calculation for Orleans’s net U.S. tax liability
Using this formula
Tax liability=Taxable income×U.S tax rate
Let plug in the formula
Tax liability=$2,000,000×21%
Tax liability=$420,000
Therefore Orleans’s net U.S. tax will be $420,000. The withholding tax amount of $8,000 was not included because it was already imposed on the dividend.
The statement "The sender & receiver don't know each other, money send for sounds like very good to be true dealing, and the motive of the transactions with respect to the online goods is considered to be questionable" is considered to be the red flag.
The sender i.e. Geroge who not even know the receiver that sells the homeopathy remedies online so this could raise a few issues but it is not to be considered very serious for red-flagged:
- Since e-commerce arises each and every time that lies between non-known parties online.
This is due to the dirt chape that could make it suspicious also they don't know each other so this should be considered red-flagged.
- The instructions with regard to the payment do not represent any signal of reliability and truthfulness so might me the receiver is trustworthy and genuine.
- In the case when the homeopathy remedies do not have the licensing and permissions so it would become questionable.
No one could suggest the specific brand of homeopathy as it becomes nonprofessional and non-appropriate, so the last option is not be considered.
Therefore we can conclude that The statement "The sender & receiver don't know each other, money send for sounds like very good to be true dealing, and the motive of the transactions with respect to the online goods is considered to be questionable" is considered to be the red flag.
Learn more about homeopathy here: brainly.com/question/7460064
