Answer:
Limited Supply of lawyers will lead to increase in Lawyer Wages / Salaries
Explanation:
Labour Markets are at equilibrium where : Labour Demand (by firms) = Labour Supply (by employees).
Analysing the labour market for Lawyers : Previous anticipations finally leading to small graduating classes & limited supply of lawyers. This limited supply creates excess demand of lawyers. The mismatched excess demand (by firms) creates competition among buyer firms, which leads to increase in price (wages or salaries) of lawyers.
Answer:
option D
$148.2
Explanation:
Given in the question,
cost of fish = $84.79
cost of filter on sale = $44.75
cost of plants = $18.66
Total cost = $84.79 + $44.75 + $18.66
= $148.2
Answer:
Macaroni and cheese is an inferior good.
Explanation:
From the information given in the question, we can assume that macaroni and cheese are considered as an inferior good for this consumer because there is an inverse relationship between the income level of this consumer and the quantity demanded for macaroni and cheese.
If there is 10% increase in the income of an individual then as a result quantity demanded of macaroni and cheese decreases by 15% and the price of this good remains constant. This shows that macaroni and cheese is an inferior good.
Answer:
Greg’s capital gain on the apartment = $590,000
Explanation:
Purchase Cost = $100,000
Improvements = $300,000
Total Initial cost = Purchase Cost + Improvements
Total Initial cost = $100,000 + $300,000
Total Initial cost = $400,000
Depreciation for 20 Years = Depreciation per annum * 20
= $2,500 * 20
= $50,000
Net Book value after 20 Years = Initial cost - Depreciation for 20 Years
= $400,000 - $50,000
= $350,000
Capital Gain = Net Sale - Net Book Value
When Net Sale = Sale Price - Commission
= $1,000,000 - $ 60,000
= $940,000
Hence, Capital Gain = Net Sale - Net Book Value
Capital Gain = $940,000 - $350,000
Capital Gain = $590,000
Answer:
Chocolates R' Us, Inc.
Family hostility cannot be used as an argument to void the family attribution rules.
Lucy is still legally married to Desi. What the husband, Desi, therefore, owes, she owes equally despite their separation and her intention to reduce her ownership in their joint company.
Explanation:
Family Attribution Rules: Section 318 of the Internal Revenue Code says an individual shall be considered as owning the stock owned, directly or indirectly, by or for his spouse and his children, grandchildren, and parents, including legally adopted children.
